[PATCH v6 05/16] spi: dw: Add SPI Rx-done wait method to DMA-based transfer
From: Serge Semin
Date: Fri May 29 2020 - 09:12:26 EST
Having any data left in the Rx FIFO after the DMA engine claimed it has
finished all DMA transactions is an abnormal situation, since the DW SPI
controller driver expects to have all the data being fetched and placed
into the SPI Rx buffer at that moment. In case if that has happened we
hopefully assume that the DMA engine may still be doing the data fetching,
thus we give it sometime to finish. If after a short period of time the
data is still left in the Rx FIFO, the driver will give up waiting and
return an error indicating that the SPI controller/DMA engine must have
hung up or failed at some point of doing their duties.
Fixes: 7063c0d942a1 ("spi/dw_spi: add DMA support")
Co-developed-by: Georgy Vlasov <Georgy.Vlasov@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Georgy Vlasov <Georgy.Vlasov@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Serge Semin <Sergey.Semin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Ramil Zaripov <Ramil.Zaripov@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Alexey Malahov <Alexey.Malahov@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx>
Cc: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Feng Tang <feng.tang@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Rob Herring <robh+dt@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: linux-mips@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Cc: devicetree@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
---
Changelog v5:
- Create a dedicated patch which adds the Rx-done wait method.
- Add more detailed description of the problem the patch fixes.
- Wait for the SPI Rx transfer finish in the mid_spi_dma_transfer() method
executed in the task context.
- Use spi_delay_exec() to wait for the SPI Rx completion, since now the
driver does in the kernel thread context.
- Wait for a delay correlated with the APB/SSI synchronous clock rate
instead of using the SPI bus clock rate.
Changelog v6:
- Calculate the delay with better accuracy by moving 4-multiplication
to the head of the formulae:
ns = 4U * NSEC_PER_SEC / dws->max_freq * nents.
---
drivers/spi/spi-dw-mid.c | 48 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
1 file changed, 47 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/spi/spi-dw-mid.c b/drivers/spi/spi-dw-mid.c
index 846e3db91329..abd6955ad1f7 100644
--- a/drivers/spi/spi-dw-mid.c
+++ b/drivers/spi/spi-dw-mid.c
@@ -248,6 +248,49 @@ static struct dma_async_tx_descriptor *dw_spi_dma_prepare_tx(struct dw_spi *dws,
return txdesc;
}
+static inline bool dw_spi_dma_rx_busy(struct dw_spi *dws)
+{
+ return !!(dw_readl(dws, DW_SPI_SR) & SR_RF_NOT_EMPT);
+}
+
+static int dw_spi_dma_wait_rx_done(struct dw_spi *dws)
+{
+ int retry = WAIT_RETRIES;
+ struct spi_delay delay;
+ unsigned long ns, us;
+ u32 nents;
+
+ /*
+ * It's unlikely that DMA engine is still doing the data fetching, but
+ * if it's let's give it some reasonable time. The timeout calculation
+ * is based on the synchronous APB/SSI reference clock rate, on a
+ * number of data entries left in the Rx FIFO, times a number of clock
+ * periods normally needed for a single APB read/write transaction
+ * without PREADY signal utilized (which is true for the DW APB SSI
+ * controller).
+ */
+ nents = dw_readl(dws, DW_SPI_RXFLR);
+ ns = 4U * NSEC_PER_SEC / dws->max_freq * nents;
+ if (ns <= NSEC_PER_USEC) {
+ delay.unit = SPI_DELAY_UNIT_NSECS;
+ delay.value = ns;
+ } else {
+ us = DIV_ROUND_UP(ns, NSEC_PER_USEC);
+ delay.unit = SPI_DELAY_UNIT_USECS;
+ delay.value = clamp_val(us, 0, USHRT_MAX);
+ }
+
+ while (dw_spi_dma_rx_busy(dws) && retry--)
+ spi_delay_exec(&delay, NULL);
+
+ if (retry < 0) {
+ dev_err(&dws->master->dev, "Rx hanged up\n");
+ return -EIO;
+ }
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
/*
* dws->dma_chan_busy is set before the dma transfer starts, callback for rx
* channel will clear a corresponding bit.
@@ -358,7 +401,10 @@ static int mid_spi_dma_transfer(struct dw_spi *dws, struct spi_transfer *xfer)
return ret;
}
- return 0;
+ if (rxdesc && dws->master->cur_msg->status == -EINPROGRESS)
+ ret = dw_spi_dma_wait_rx_done(dws);
+
+ return ret;
}
static void mid_spi_dma_stop(struct dw_spi *dws)
--
2.26.2