Re: [PATCH v6 02/11] dt-bindings: i2c: Convert DW I2C slave to the DW I2C master example

[Rob Herring]

On Thu, 28 May 2020 12:33:12 +0300, Serge Semin wrote:
> dtc currently doesn't support I2C_OWN_SLAVE_ADDRESS flag set in the
> i2c "reg" property. If dtc finds an i2c-slave sub-node having an address
> higher than ten-bits wide it'll print an ugly warning:
> 
> Warning (i2c_bus_reg): /example-2/i2c@1120000/eeprom@64: I2C bus unit address format error, expected "40000064"
> Warning (i2c_bus_reg): /example-2/i2c@1120000/eeprom@64:reg: I2C address must be less than 10-bits, got "0x40000064"
> 
> In order to silence dtc up let's replace the corresponding DT binding
> example with a normal DW I2C master mode-based one. It's done by clearing
> the I2C_OWN_SLAVE_ADDRESS bit in the reg property and converting the
> sub-node to be compatible with normal EEPROM like "atmel,24c02".
> 
> Just revert this commit when dtc is fixed.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Serge Semin <Sergey.Semin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Alexey Malahov <Alexey.Malahov@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: linux-mips@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> 
> ---
> 
> Rob, even though you asked for such modification, it might be a better to
> just ignore the warning until dtc is properly fixed. Andy and me agree
> with that. If you are also on the same side with us, just explicitly nack
> this patch so Jarkko or Wolfram would ignore it when merging in the series.
> 
> Changelog v3:
> - This is a new patch created as a result of the Rob request to remove
>   the EEPROM-slave bit setting in the DT binndings example until the dtc
>   is fixed.
> 
> Changelog v6:
> - Replace the "linux,slave-24c02" compatible string with "atmel,24c02" one
>   so the example would be perceived as a normal DW I2C master mode.
> ---
>  .../devicetree/bindings/i2c/snps,designware-i2c.yaml          | 4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 

Reviewed-by: Rob Herring <robh@xxxxxxxxxx>