[PATCH] locking/Kconfig: Don't forcefully uninline spin_unlock for PREEMPT

[Sultan Alsawaf]

From: Sultan Alsawaf <sultan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

This change was originally done in 2005 without any justification in
commit bda98685b855 ("[PATCH] x86: inline spin_unlock if
!CONFIG_DEBUG_SPINLOCK and !CONFIG_PREEMPT"). Perhaps the reasoning at
the time was that PREEMPT was still considered unstable and needed extra
debugging; however, this is no longer the case, so remove the artificial
limitation.

Signed-off-by: Sultan Alsawaf <sultan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
 kernel/Kconfig.preempt | 1 -
 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/kernel/Kconfig.preempt b/kernel/Kconfig.preempt
index bf82259cff96..5a9e0409c844 100644
--- a/kernel/Kconfig.preempt
+++ b/kernel/Kconfig.preempt
@@ -39,7 +39,6 @@ config PREEMPT
 	bool "Preemptible Kernel (Low-Latency Desktop)"
 	depends on !ARCH_NO_PREEMPT
 	select PREEMPTION
-	select UNINLINE_SPIN_UNLOCK if !ARCH_INLINE_SPIN_UNLOCK
 	help
 	  This option reduces the latency of the kernel by making
 	  all kernel code (that is not executing in a critical section)
-- 
2.26.2