Re: [GIT PULL] sh: remove sh5 support

[John Paul Adrian Glaubitz]

On 5/31/20 5:20 AM, Rob Landley wrote:
> On 5/30/20 3:08 AM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
>> On 5/29/20 7:53 PM, Rich Felker wrote:
>>> Frustratingly, I _still_ don't have an official tree on kernel.org for
>>> the purpose of being the canonical place for linux-next to pull from,
>>> due to policies around pgp keys and nobody following up on signing
>>> mine. This is all really silly since there are ridiculously many
>>> independent channels I could cryptographically validate identity
>>> through with vanishing probability that they're all compromised. For
>>> the time being I'll reactivate my repo on git.musl-libc.org.
>>
>> May I suggest to pick up these patches, for example? There might be
>> more I missed, but getting these merged should already help a lot with
>> the clean-up of arch/sh.
> 
> Does that include the 2 fixes to build with current binutils I made puppy eyes
> about last -rc7 (in march)?
> 
> https://marc.info/?l=linux-sh&m=158544749818664&w=2
Yes, listed as "[PATCH 1/2] arch/sh: vmlinux.scr".

@Rich: Do you think you can merge all those fixes in your local tree within
       the next days and send a PR to Linus?

Otherwise, I can volunteer to become a third maintainer for arch/sh as I have
the hardware for testing and can accept patches and send PRs.

We shouldn't let contributors to arch/sh wait for too long.

Adrian

-- 
 .''`.  John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
: :' :  Debian Developer - glaubitz@xxxxxxxxxx
`. `'   Freie Universitaet Berlin - glaubitz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  `-    GPG: 62FF 8A75 84E0 2956 9546  0006 7426 3B37 F5B5 F913