RE: [RFC/RFT][PATCH] cpufreq: intel_pstate: Accept passive mode with HWP enabled

From: Doug Smythies
Date: Sun May 31 2020 - 13:16:03 EST

Next message: Emil Velikov: "Re: [PATCH] drm/vkms: Optimize compute_crc(), blend()"
Previous message: William Breathitt Gray: "Re: [PATCH v2 0/4] Introduce the Counter character device interface"
In reply to: Doug Smythies: "RE: [RFC/RFT][PATCH] cpufreq: intel_pstate: Accept passive mode with HWP enabled"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Correction:

On 2020.05.31 09:39 Doug smythies wrote:

> The overruns and use of idle state 0 are exactly correlated.

Should have been "idle state 2":

The overruns and use of idle state 2 are exactly correlated.

Next message: Emil Velikov: "Re: [PATCH] drm/vkms: Optimize compute_crc(), blend()"
Previous message: William Breathitt Gray: "Re: [PATCH v2 0/4] Introduce the Counter character device interface"
In reply to: Doug Smythies: "RE: [RFC/RFT][PATCH] cpufreq: intel_pstate: Accept passive mode with HWP enabled"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]