[PATCH v2 3/3] x86, sched: Bail out of frequency invariance if turbo_freq/base_freq gives 0
From: Giovanni Gherdovich
Date: Sun May 31 2020 - 14:26:27 EST
Be defensive against the case where the processor reports a base_freq
larger than turbo_freq (the ratio would be zero).
Signed-off-by: Giovanni Gherdovich <ggherdovich@xxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Fixes: 1567c3e3467c ("x86, sched: Add support for frequency invariance")
---
arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c | 11 +++++++++--
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c b/arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c
index fe154c8226ba..f619007f46cf 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c
@@ -1976,6 +1976,7 @@ static bool core_set_max_freq_ratio(u64 *base_freq, u64 *turbo_freq)
static bool intel_set_max_freq_ratio(void)
{
u64 base_freq, turbo_freq;
+ u64 turbo_ratio;
if (slv_set_max_freq_ratio(&base_freq, &turbo_freq))
goto out;
@@ -2009,9 +2010,15 @@ static bool intel_set_max_freq_ratio(void)
return false;
}
- arch_turbo_freq_ratio = div_u64(turbo_freq * SCHED_CAPACITY_SCALE,
- base_freq);
+ turbo_ratio = div_u64(turbo_freq * SCHED_CAPACITY_SCALE, base_freq);
+ if (!turbo_ratio) {
+ pr_debug("Non-zero turbo and base frequencies led to a 0 ratio.\n");
+ return false;
+ }
+
+ arch_turbo_freq_ratio = turbo_ratio;
arch_set_max_freq_ratio(turbo_disabled());
+
return true;
}
--
2.16.4