Re: [PATCH v6] support gce on mt6779 platform

[Dennis-YC Hsieh]

Hi Jassi,

Thanks for your comment

On Sat, 2020-05-30 at 15:34 -0500, Jassi Brar wrote:
> On Thu, May 28, 2020 at 12:05 PM Dennis YC Hsieh
> <dennis-yc.hsieh@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > This patch support gce on mt6779 platform.
> >
> > Change since v5:
> > - spearate address shift code in client helper and mailbox controller
> > - separate write_s/write_s_mask and write_s_value/write_s_mask_value so that
> >   client can decide use mask or not
> > - fix typo in header
> >
> > Change since v4:
> > - do not clear disp event again in drm driver
> > - symbolize value 1 to jump relative
> >
> > [... snip ...]
> >
> >
> >
> > Dennis YC Hsieh (16):
> >   dt-binding: gce: add gce header file for mt6779
> >   mailbox: cmdq: variablize address shift in platform
> >   mailbox: cmdq: support mt6779 gce platform definition
> >   mailbox: mediatek: cmdq: clear task in channel before shutdown
> >   soc: mediatek: cmdq: return send msg error code
> >   soc: mediatek: cmdq: add address shift in jump
> >   soc: mediatek: cmdq: add assign function
> >   soc: mediatek: cmdq: add write_s function
> >   soc: mediatek: cmdq: add write_s_mask function
> >   soc: mediatek: cmdq: add read_s function
> >   soc: mediatek: cmdq: add write_s value function
> >   soc: mediatek: cmdq: add write_s_mask value function
> >   soc: mediatek: cmdq: export finalize function
> >   soc: mediatek: cmdq: add jump function
> >   soc: mediatek: cmdq: add clear option in cmdq_pkt_wfe api
> >   soc: mediatek: cmdq: add set event function
> >
> >  .../devicetree/bindings/mailbox/mtk-gce.txt   |   8 +-
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_drm_crtc.c       |   3 +-
> >  drivers/mailbox/mtk-cmdq-mailbox.c            | 101 ++++++--
> >  drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-cmdq-helper.c        | 163 ++++++++++++-
> >  include/dt-bindings/gce/mt6779-gce.h          | 222 ++++++++++++++++++
> >  include/linux/mailbox/mtk-cmdq-mailbox.h      |  10 +-
> >  include/linux/soc/mediatek/mtk-cmdq.h         | 125 +++++++++-
> >
> Please break the patchset into two. The lower mailbox related changes
> with soc changes on top.

Ok, I'll separate patches into two patchset, thanks.


Regards,
Dennis

> 
> thanks