Re: [PATCH v9 13/19] mtd: spi-nor: sfdp: do not make invalid quad enable fatal
From: Pratyush Yadav
Date: Mon Jun 01 2020 - 04:59:45 EST
Hi Tudor,
On 30/05/20 06:42PM, Tudor.Ambarus@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> On Monday, May 25, 2020 12:15:38 PM EEST Pratyush Yadav wrote:
> > EXTERNAL EMAIL: Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the
> > content is safe
> >
> > The Micron MT35XU512ABA flash does not support the quad enable bit. But
> > instead of programming the Quad Enable Require field to 000b ("Device
> > does not have a QE bit"), it is programmed to 111b ("Reserved").
> >
> > While this is technically incorrect, it is not reason enough to abort
> > BFPT parsing. Instead, continue BFPT parsing assuming there is no quad
> > enable bit present.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Pratyush Yadav <p.yadav@xxxxxx>
> > ---
> > drivers/mtd/spi-nor/sfdp.c | 8 +++-----
> > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/sfdp.c b/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/sfdp.c
> > index 052cabb52df9..9fd3d8d9a127 100644
> > --- a/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/sfdp.c
> > +++ b/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/sfdp.c
> > @@ -576,10 +576,6 @@ static int spi_nor_parse_bfpt(struct spi_nor *nor,
> >
> > /* Quad Enable Requirements. */
> > switch (bfpt.dwords[BFPT_DWORD(15)] & BFPT_DWORD15_QER_MASK) {
> > - case BFPT_DWORD15_QER_NONE:
> > - params->quad_enable = NULL;
> > - break;
> > -
> > case BFPT_DWORD15_QER_SR2_BIT1_BUGGY:
> > /*
> > * Writing only one byte to the Status Register has the
> > @@ -616,8 +612,10 @@ static int spi_nor_parse_bfpt(struct spi_nor *nor,
> > params->quad_enable = spi_nor_sr2_bit1_quad_enable;
> > break;
> >
> > + case BFPT_DWORD15_QER_NONE:
> > default:
> > - return -EINVAL;
> > + params->quad_enable = NULL;
> > + break;
>
> I would just add a dev_dbg message and break the switch.
> dev_dbg(nor->dev, "BFPT QER reserved value used.\n");
> break;
>
> You will then have to set params->quad_enable = NULL; in a post_bfpt hook.
Ok. Will re-roll.
BTW, are you planning to pick up the xSPI/8D support for 5.8? It has
been outstanding for quite some time now and it would be great if it can
make it through this merge window.
--
Regards,
Pratyush Yadav
Texas Instruments India