Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] checks: Improve i2c reg property checking
From: Serge Semin
Date: Tue Jun 02 2020 - 04:01:15 EST
On Thu, May 28, 2020 at 06:26:50PM +0930, Joel Stanley wrote:
> The i2c bindings in the kernel tree describe support for 10 bit
> addressing, which must be indicated with the I2C_TEN_BIT_ADDRESS flag.
> When this is set the address can be up to 10 bits. When it is not set
> the address is a maximum of 7 bits.
>
> See Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/i2c.txt.
>
> Take into account this flag when checking the address is valid.
>
> Signed-off-by: Joel Stanley <joel@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> v2: Mask reg when checking the 10-bit size
> ---
> checks.c | 8 ++++++--
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/checks.c b/checks.c
> index feb1721f2603..3fe979a63290 100644
> --- a/checks.c
> +++ b/checks.c
> @@ -1023,6 +1023,7 @@ static void check_i2c_bus_bridge(struct check *c, struct dt_info *dti, struct no
> WARNING(i2c_bus_bridge, check_i2c_bus_bridge, NULL, &addr_size_cells);
>
> #define I2C_OWN_SLAVE_ADDRESS (1 << 30)
> +#define I2C_TEN_BIT_ADDRESS (1 << 31)
As Andy neatly pointed out here:
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20200527133656.GV1634618@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/
(1 << 31) is UB.
-Sergey
>
> static void check_i2c_bus_reg(struct check *c, struct dt_info *dti, struct node *node)
> {
> @@ -1057,10 +1058,13 @@ static void check_i2c_bus_reg(struct check *c, struct dt_info *dti, struct node
> reg = fdt32_to_cpu(*(cells++));
> /* Ignore I2C_OWN_SLAVE_ADDRESS */
> reg &= ~I2C_OWN_SLAVE_ADDRESS;
> - if (reg > 0x3ff)
> +
> + if ((reg & I2C_TEN_BIT_ADDRESS) && ((reg & ~I2C_TEN_BIT_ADDRESS) > 0x3ff))
> FAIL_PROP(c, dti, node, prop, "I2C address must be less than 10-bits, got \"0x%x\"",
> reg);
> -
> + else if (reg > 0x7f)
> + FAIL_PROP(c, dti, node, prop, "I2C address must be less than 7-bits, got \"0x%x\". Set I2C_TEN_BIT_ADDRESS for 10 bit addresses or fix the property",
> + reg);
> }
> }
> WARNING(i2c_bus_reg, check_i2c_bus_reg, NULL, ®_format, &i2c_bus_bridge);
> --
> 2.26.2
>