Re: [PATCH] iommu/dma: limit iova free size to unmmaped iova

[guptap]

On 2020-05-26 12:49, guptap@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> On 2020-05-22 14:54, Robin Murphy wrote:
> > On 2020-05-22 07:25, guptap@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> > > On 2020-05-22 01:46, Robin Murphy wrote:
> > > > On 2020-05-21 12:30, Prakash Gupta wrote:
> > > I agree, we shouldn't be freeing the partial iova. Instead just 
> > > making
> > > sure if unmap was successful should be sufficient before freeing 
> > > iova. So change
> > > can instead be something like this:
> > >
> > > -ÂÂÂ iommu_dma_free_iova(cookie, dma_addr, size);
> > > +ÂÂÂ if (unmapped)
> > > +ÂÂÂÂÂÂÂ iommu_dma_free_iova(cookie, dma_addr, size);
> > >
> > > > TBH my gut feeling here is that you're really just trying to treat a
> > > > symptom of another bug elsewhere, namely some driver calling
> > > > dma_unmap_* or dma_free_* with the wrong address or size in the 
> > > > first
> > > > place.
> > > This condition would arise only if driver calling dma_unmap/free_* 
> > > with 0
> > > iova_pfn. This will be flagged with a warning during unmap but will 
> > > trigger
> > > panic later on while doing unrelated dma_map/unmap_*. If unmapped has 
> > > already
> > > failed for invalid iova, there is no reason we should consider this 
> > > as valid
> > > iova and free. This part should be fixed.
> >
> > I disagree. In general, if drivers call the DMA API incorrectly it is
> > liable to lead to data loss, memory corruption, and various other
> > unpleasant misbehaviour - it is not the DMA layer's job to attempt to
> > paper over driver bugs.
> >
> > There *is* an argument for downgrading the BUG_ON() in
> > iova_magazine_free_pfns() to a WARN_ON(), since frankly it isn't a
> > sufficiently serious condition to justify killing the whole machine
> > immediately, but NAK to bodging the iommu-dma mid-layer to "fix" that.
> > A serious bug already happened elsewhere, so trying to hide the
> > fallout really doesn't help anyone.
> Sorry for delayed response, it was a long weekend.
> I agree that invalid DMA API call can result in unexpected issues and 
> client
> should fix it, but then the present behavior makes it difficult to 
> catch cases
> when driver is making wrong DMA API calls. When invalid iova pfn is 
> passed it
> doesn't fail then and there, though DMA layer is aware of iova being 
> invalid. It
> fails much after that in the context of an valid map/unmap, with 
> BUG_ON().
>
> Downgrading BUG_ON() to WARN_ON() in iova_magazine_free_pfns() will not 
> help
> much as invalid iova will cause NULL pointer dereference.
>
> I see no reason why DMA layer wants to free an iova for which unmapped 
> failed.
> IMHO queuing an invalid iova (which already failed unmap) to rcache 
> which
> eventually going to crash the system looks like iommu-dma layer issue.
>
> Thanks,
> Prakash

ping?