Re: [PATCH v4 7/7] mtd: spi-nor: macronix: Add Octal 8D-8D-8D supports for Macronix mx25uw51245g
From: Pratyush Yadav
Date: Wed Jun 03 2020 - 01:54:17 EST
On 02/06/20 02:44PM, masonccyang@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
>
> Hi Pratyush,
>
>
> > Subject
> >
> > Re: [PATCH v4 7/7] mtd: spi-nor: macronix: Add Octal 8D-8D-8D supports
> for
> > Macronix mx25uw51245g
> >
> > On 29/05/20 03:36PM, Mason Yang wrote:
> > > Macronix mx25uw51245g is a SPI NOR that supports 1-1-1/8-8-8 mode.
> > >
> > > Correct the dummy cycles to device for various frequencies
> > > after xSPI profile 1.0 table parsed.
> > >
> > > Enable mx25uw51245g to Octal DTR mode by executing the command
> sequences
> > > to change to octal DTR mode.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Mason Yang <masonccyang@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > ---
> > > drivers/mtd/spi-nor/macronix.c | 55
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > > 1 file changed, 55 insertions(+)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/macronix.c
> b/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/macronix.c
> > > index 96735d8..6c9a24c 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/macronix.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/macronix.c
> > > @@ -8,6 +8,57 @@
> > >
> > > #include "core.h"
> > >
> > > +#define MXIC_CR2_DUMMY_SET_ADDR 0x300
> > > +
> > > +/* Fixup the dummy cycles to device and setup octa_dtr_enable() */
> > > +static void mx25uw51245g_post_sfdp_fixups(struct spi_nor *nor)
> > > +{
> > > + struct spi_nor_flash_parameter *params = nor->params;
> > > + int ret;
> > > + u8 rdc, wdc;
> > > +
> > > + ret = spi_nor_read_cr2(nor, MXIC_CR2_DUMMY_SET_ADDR, &rdc);
> > > + if (ret)
> > > + return;
> > > +
> > > + /* Refer to dummy cycle and frequency table(MHz) */
> > > + switch (params->dummy_cycles) {
> > > + case 10: /* 10 dummy cycles for 104 MHz */
> > > + wdc = 5;
> > > + break;
> > > + case 12: /* 12 dummy cycles for 133 MHz */
> > > + wdc = 4;
> > > + break;
> > > + case 16: /* 16 dummy cycles for 166 MHz */
> > > + wdc = 2;
> > > + break;
> > > + case 18: /* 18 dummy cycles for 173 MHz */
> > > + wdc = 1;
> > > + break;
> > > + case 20: /* 20 dummy cycles for 200 MHz */
> > > + default:
> > > + wdc = 0;
> > > + }
> >
> > I don't get the point of this. You already know the fastest the
> > mx25uw51245g flash can run at. Why not just use the maximum dummy
> > cycles? SPI NOR doesn't know the speed the controller is running at so
> > the best it can do is use the maximum dummy cycles possible so it never
> > falls short. Sure, it will be _slightly_ less performance, but we will
> > be sure to read the correct data, which is much much more important.
>
> In general, 200MHz needs 20 dummy cycles but some powerful device may only
>
> needs 18 dummy cycles or less.
Yes, but do different mx25uw51245g chips have different dummy cycle
requirements? Shouldn't all the chips with the same ID have same
performance?
This is a fixup hook for mx25uw51245g, so you should already know how
many cycles are needed for this specific device. Is there any need for
generic code here?
> Set a proper dummy cycles for a better performance.
>
> >
> > Is it possible to have two chips which have _exactly_ the same ID but
> > one supports say 200MHz frequency but the other doesn't? Without that,
> > we can just enable the maximum and move on.
> >
>
--
Regards,
Pratyush Yadav