RE: [PATCH 11/15] mmc: sdhci: use PCI_IRQ_MSI_TYPES where appropriate

[Stankiewicz, Piotr]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Wednesday, June 3, 2020 7:27 AM
> To: Stankiewicz, Piotr <piotr.stankiewicz@xxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Hunter, Adrian <adrian.hunter@xxxxxxxxx>; Ulf Hansson
> <ulf.hansson@xxxxxxxxxx>; linux-mmc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-
> kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 11/15] mmc: sdhci: use PCI_IRQ_MSI_TYPES where
> appropriate
> 
> On Tue, Jun 02, 2020 at 11:20:59AM +0200, Piotr Stankiewicz wrote:
> > Seeing as there is shorthand available to use when asking for any type
> > of interrupt, or any type of message signalled interrupt, leverage it.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Piotr Stankiewicz <piotr.stankiewicz@xxxxxxxxx>
> > Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxx>
> 
> So this crap now shows up piecemail on various lists?  Indepent of that it seems
> like a bad idea to start with, bombing people with patches that apparently
> depend on something you did first but they are not Cced on is just an amazingly
> bad idea.  Don't do that ever.

I've sent the cover letter for the series to everyone question, to avoid spamming
people with irrelevant patches, but so that they can find the rest if necessary.
What would be a preferable thing to do?