Re: Security Random Number Generator support

[Marc Zyngier]

On 2020-06-03 08:54, Neal Liu wrote:
> On Wed, 2020-06-03 at 08:40 +0100, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> > On 2020-06-03 08:29, Neal Liu wrote:

[...]

> > > Could you give us a hint how to make this SMC interface more generic in
> > > addition to my approach?
> > > There is no (easy) way to get platform-independent SMC function ID,
> > > which is why we encode it into device tree, and provide a generic
> > > driver. In this way, different devices can be mapped and then get
> > > different function ID internally.
> >
> > The idea is simply to have *one* single ID that caters for all
> > implementations, just like we did for PSCI at the time. This
> > requires ARM to edict a standard, which is what I was referring
> > to above.
> >
> > There is zero benefit in having a platform-dependent ID. It just
> > pointlessly increases complexity, and means we cannot use the RNG
> > before the firmware tables are available (yes, we need it that
> > early).
> >
> >          M.
>
> Do you know which ARM expert could edict this standard?
> Or is there any chance that we can make one? And be reviewed by
> maintainers?

Sudeep already mentioned Jose's effort to offer a standard.
Hopefully he will *soon* be able to give us something that can be
implemented everywhere (firmware, kernel, but also hypervisors),
as the need exists across the whole stack.

        M.
--
Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny...