Re: [Patch v2] lib: test get_count_order/long in test_bitops.c

From: Geert Uytterhoeven
Date: Thu Jun 04 2020 - 07:50:27 EST


Hi Wei,

On Wed, Jun 3, 2020 at 1:11 AM Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Add some test for get_count_order/long in test_bitops.c.
>
> Signed-off-by: Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@xxxxxxxxx>

Thanks for your patch, which is now commit 7851d6639caeea40 ("lib:
test get_count_order/long in test_bitops.c") in linux-next.

> --- a/lib/test_bitops.c
> +++ b/lib/test_bitops.c

> @@ -24,6 +28,26 @@ enum bitops_fun {
>
> static DECLARE_BITMAP(g_bitmap, BITOPS_LENGTH);
>
> +unsigned int order_comb[][2] = {
> + {0x00000003, 2},
> + {0x00000004, 2},
> + {0x00001fff, 13},
> + {0x00002000, 13},
> + {0x50000000, 31},
> + {0x80000000, 31},
> + {0x80003000, 32},
> +};
> +
> +unsigned long order_comb_long[][2] = {
> + {0x0000000300000000, 34},
> + {0x0000000400000000, 34},
> + {0x00001fff00000000, 45},
> + {0x0000200000000000, 45},
> + {0x5000000000000000, 63},
> + {0x8000000000000000, 63},
> + {0x8000300000000000, 64},
> +};

noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx reported for m68k-allmodconfig:

lib/test_bitops.c:42:3: error: unsigned conversion from 'long long
int' to 'long unsigned int' changes value from '12884901888' to '0'
[-Werror=overflow]
lib/test_bitops.c:43:3: error: unsigned conversion from 'long long
int' to 'long unsigned int' changes value from '17179869184' to '0'
[-Werror=overflow]
lib/test_bitops.c:44:3: error: unsigned conversion from 'long long
int' to 'long unsigned int' changes value from '35180077121536' to '0'
[-Werror=overflow]
lib/test_bitops.c:45:3: error: unsigned conversion from 'long long
int' to 'long unsigned int' changes value from '35184372088832' to '0'
[-Werror=overflow]
lib/test_bitops.c:46:3: error: unsigned conversion from 'long long
int' to 'long unsigned int' changes value from '5764607523034234880'
to '0' [-Werror=overflow]
lib/test_bitops.c:47:3: error: conversion from 'long long unsigned
int' to 'long unsigned int' changes value from '9223372036854775808'
to '0' [-Werror=overflow]
lib/test_bitops.c:48:3: error: conversion from 'long long unsigned
int' to 'long unsigned int' changes value from '9223424813412909056'
to '0' [-Werror=overflow]

Indeed, on 32-bit, none of these values fit in unsigned long.

> static int __init test_bitops_startup(void)
> {
> pr_warn("Loaded test module\n");
> @@ -32,6 +56,18 @@ static int __init test_bitops_startup(void)
> set_bit(BITOPS_11, g_bitmap);
> set_bit(BITOPS_31, g_bitmap);
> set_bit(BITOPS_88, g_bitmap);
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(order_comb); i++) {
> + if (order_comb[i][1] != get_count_order(order_comb[i][0]))
> + pr_warn("get_count_order wrong for %x\n",
> + order_comb[i][0]); }
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(order_comb_long); i++) {
> + if (order_comb_long[i][1] !=
> + get_count_order_long(order_comb_long[i][0]))
> + pr_warn("get_count_order_long wrong for %lx\n",
> + order_comb_long[i][0]); }
> +
> return 0;

BTW, shouldn't get_count_order_long() be tested with the values in
order_comb[], too?

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

Geert

--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds