Re: [PATCH] linux/bits.h: fix unsigned less than zero warnings

From: Rikard Falkeborn
Date: Thu Jun 04 2020 - 19:30:14 EST


On Thu, Jun 04, 2020 at 09:41:29AM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 4, 2020 at 1:03 AM Rikard Falkeborn
> <rikard.falkeborn@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > When calling the GENMASK and GENMASK_ULL macros with zero lower bit and
> > an unsigned unknown high bit, some gcc versions warn due to the
> > comparisons of the high and low bit in GENMASK_INPUT_CHECK.
> >
> > To silence the warnings, cast the inputs to int before doing the
> > comparisons. The only valid inputs to GENMASK() and GENMASK_ULL() are
> > are 0 to 31 or 63. Anything outside this is undefined due to the shifts
> > in GENMASK()/GENMASK_ULL(). Therefore, casting the inputs to int do not
> > change the values for valid known inputs. For unknown values, the check
> > does not change anything since it's a compile-time check only.
> >
> > As an example of the warning, kindly reported by the kbuild test robot:
> >
> > from drivers/mfd/atmel-smc.c:11:
> > drivers/mfd/atmel-smc.c: In function 'atmel_smc_cs_encode_ncycles':
> > include/linux/bits.h:26:28: warning: comparison of unsigned expression < 0 is always false [-Wtype-limits]
> > 26 | __builtin_constant_p((l) > (h)), (l) > (h), 0)))
> > | ^
> > include/linux/build_bug.h:16:62: note: in definition of macro 'BUILD_BUG_ON_ZERO'
> > 16 | #define BUILD_BUG_ON_ZERO(e) ((int)(sizeof(struct { int:(-!!(e)); })))
> > | ^
> > include/linux/bits.h:39:3: note: in expansion of macro 'GENMASK_INPUT_CHECK'
> > 39 | (GENMASK_INPUT_CHECK(h, l) + __GENMASK(h, l))
> > | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> > >> drivers/mfd/atmel-smc.c:49:25: note: in expansion of macro 'GENMASK'
> > 49 | unsigned int lsbmask = GENMASK(msbpos - 1, 0);
> > | ^~~~~~~
> >
>
> Thank you for the patch!
>
> I think there is still a possibility to improve (as I mentioned there
> are test cases that are absent right now).
> What if we will have unsigned long value 0x100000001? Would it be 1
> after casting?
>
> Maybe cast to (long) or (long long) more appropriate?

It you're entering 0x10000001 you're going to get a compiler warning
since it's going to be shifted out of range, when I wrote the check I
figured that should be enough, but perhaps I was wrong?

How about requiring both l and h bit to be constant? (that's
arguably the way I should have written in the first place). That's going
to remove the warnings for GENMASK(x, 0). It will not work as expected
when mixing negative and unsigned input, like GENMASK(-1, 0u) is not
going to fail the build while GENMASK(1u, -1) will. For GENMASK(-1, 0u),
you will get a compiler warning due to the shifts in GENMASK.

If we need to handle the negative inputs as well. I think I'd prefer to add
explicit checks for negative values over the casting. A macro for that
can probably be reused in other places as well.

>
> Please, add test cases.

Will do.

Rikard
>
> > Fixes: 295bcca84916 ("linux/bits.h: add compile time sanity check of GENMASK inputs")
> > Reported-by: kbuild test robot <lkp@xxxxxxxxx>
> > Reported-by: Emil Velikov <emil.l.velikov@xxxxxxxxx>
> > Reported-by: Syed Nayyar Waris <syednwaris@xxxxxxxxx>
> > Signed-off-by: Rikard Falkeborn <rikard.falkeborn@xxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > include/linux/bits.h | 3 ++-
> > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/include/linux/bits.h b/include/linux/bits.h
> > index 4671fbf28842..293d1ee71a48 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/bits.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/bits.h
> > @@ -21,9 +21,10 @@
> > #if !defined(__ASSEMBLY__) && \
> > (!defined(CONFIG_CC_IS_GCC) || CONFIG_GCC_VERSION >= 49000)
> > #include <linux/build_bug.h>
> > +/* Avoid Wtype-limits warnings by casting the inputs to int */
> > #define GENMASK_INPUT_CHECK(h, l) \
> > (BUILD_BUG_ON_ZERO(__builtin_choose_expr( \
> > - __builtin_constant_p((l) > (h)), (l) > (h), 0)))
> > + __builtin_constant_p((int)(l) > (int)(h)), (int)(l) > (int)(h), 0)))
> > #else
> > /*
> > * BUILD_BUG_ON_ZERO is not available in h files included from asm files,
> > --
> > 2.27.0
> >
>
>
> --
> With Best Regards,
> Andy Shevchenko