Re: [GIT PULL] sh: remove sh5 support

[John Paul Adrian Glaubitz]

On 6/5/20 5:43 PM, Rich Felker wrote:
>> Can you include the patch as well?
> 
> This one is outside arch/sh and I'm not sure it's permissible to go up
> through my tree. I was also under the impression that only part 1 was
> needed to fix the immediate problem on sh and tha part 2 was for
> completeness and to make sure the same doesn't happen on other archs
> in the future, but maybe my understanding here is incorrect.

Ah, sorry, I missed that. You're right, it should probably go through
someone else's tree then.

>> And would it be okay to send a PR to Linus
>> after that?
> 
> Sure, will do right away once we resolve what to do with the above,
> and provided you don't have anything else you want me to evaluate for
> inclusion.

Since we haven't agreed on the __get_user_64() patch yet, I would be
in favor of getting the changes pulled in that have already been
reviewed and acknowledged. I rather don't want the other contributors
to wait any longer. Arnd in particular has done a tremendous job to
untangle all the SH-5 code and I think we should finally get this
in :).

Thanks,
Adrian

-- 
 .''`.  John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
: :' :  Debian Developer - glaubitz@xxxxxxxxxx
`. `'   Freie Universitaet Berlin - glaubitz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  `-    GPG: 62FF 8A75 84E0 2956 9546  0006 7426 3B37 F5B5 F913