Re: [PATCH 2/2] regulator: Add driver for cros-ec-regulator

[Mark Brown]

On Tue, Jun 09, 2020 at 03:59:55PM +0800, Pi-Hsun Shih wrote:

> +static int cros_ec_regulator_set_state(struct regulator_dev *dev, bool enable)
> +{
> +	struct cros_ec_regulator_data *data = rdev_get_drvdata(dev);
> +	struct ec_params_regulator_enable cmd = {
> +		.index = data->index,
> +		.enable = enable ? 1 : 0,

The ternery operator is totally redundant here.

> +static int cros_ec_regulator_enable(struct regulator_dev *dev)
> +{
> +	return cros_ec_regulator_set_state(dev, true);
> +}

> +static int cros_ec_regulator_disable(struct regulator_dev *dev)
> +{
> +	return cros_ec_regulator_set_state(dev, false);
> +}

I'm not sure that the shared function is really worthwhile though,
there's not really enough in it and certainly not anything complicated.

> +static int cros_ec_regulator_set_voltage(struct regulator_dev *dev, int min_uV,
> +					 int max_uV, unsigned int *selector)
> +{
> +	struct cros_ec_regulator_data *data = rdev_get_drvdata(dev);
> +	int min_mV = DIV_ROUND_UP(min_uV, 1000);
> +	int max_mV = max_uV / 1000;
> +	struct ec_params_regulator_set_voltage cmd = {
> +		.index = data->index,
> +		.min_mv = min_mV,
> +		.max_mv = max_mV,
> +	};
> +
> +	if (min_mV > max_mV)
> +		return -EINVAL;

The core will do this for you.

> +	ret = of_property_read_u32(np, "google,remote-regulator",
> +				   &drvdata->index);
> +	if (ret < 0)
> +		return ret;

This remote-regulator property is a bit weird, it feels like it should
be a reg property on a bus.

> +#if defined(CONFIG_OF)
> +static const struct of_device_id regulator_cros_ec_of_match[] = {
> +	{ .compatible = "regulator-cros-ec", },
> +	{},
> +};
> +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, regulator_cros_ec_of_match);
> +#endif

Your compatible is google,regulator-cros-ec.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature