Re: [PATCH v4 26/27] clk: bcm2835: Don't cache the PLLB rate

From: Nicolas Saenz Julienne
Date: Thu Jun 11 2020 - 07:17:50 EST

Next message: kernel test robot: "Re: [PATCH] iov_iter: Move unnecessary inclusion of crypto/hash.h"
Previous message: Miguel Ojeda: "[PATCH] coding-style: don't mention line length hard limits, add tips"
In reply to: Maxime Ripard: "[PATCH v4 26/27] clk: bcm2835: Don't cache the PLLB rate"
Next in thread: Maxime Ripard: "[PATCH v4 25/27] clk: bcm2835: Allow custom CCF flags for the PLLs"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Thu, 2020-06-11 at 09:32 +0200, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> The PLLB rate will be changed through the firmware clocks drivers and will
> change behind this drivers' back, so we don't want to cache the rate.
>
> Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---

Thanks!

Acked-by: Nicolas Saenz Julienne <nsaenzjulienne@xxxxxxx>

Regards,
Nicolas

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Next message: kernel test robot: "Re: [PATCH] iov_iter: Move unnecessary inclusion of crypto/hash.h"
Previous message: Miguel Ojeda: "[PATCH] coding-style: don't mention line length hard limits, add tips"
In reply to: Maxime Ripard: "[PATCH v4 26/27] clk: bcm2835: Don't cache the PLLB rate"
Next in thread: Maxime Ripard: "[PATCH v4 25/27] clk: bcm2835: Allow custom CCF flags for the PLLs"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]