Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] s390: virtio: let arch accept devices without IOMMU feature

[Cornelia Huck]

On Tue, 16 Jun 2020 12:52:50 +0200
Pierre Morel <pmorel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On 2020-06-16 11:52, Halil Pasic wrote:
> > On Mon, 15 Jun 2020 14:39:24 +0200
> > Pierre Morel <pmorel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> >> @@ -162,6 +163,11 @@ bool force_dma_unencrypted(struct device *dev)
> >>   	return is_prot_virt_guest();
> >>   }
> >>   
> >> +int arch_needs_iommu_platform(struct virtio_device *dev)  
> > 
> > Maybe prefixing the name with virtio_ would help provide the
> > proper context.  
> 
> The virtio_dev makes it obvious and from the virtio side it should be 
> obvious that the arch is responsible for this.
> 
> However if nobody has something against I change it.

arch_needs_virtio_iommu_platform()?

> 
> >   
> >> +{
> >> +	return is_prot_virt_guest();
> >> +}
> >> +
> >>   /* protected virtualization */
> >>   static void pv_init(void)
> >>   {