[PATCH 5/8] Drivers: hv: vmbus: Use channel_mutex in channel_vp_mapping_show()

[Andrea Parri (Microsoft)]

The primitive currently uses channel->lock to protect the loop over
sc_list w.r.t. list additions/deletions but it doesn't protect the
target_cpu(s) loads w.r.t. a concurrent target_cpu_store(): while the
data races on target_cpu are hardly of any concern here, replace the
channel->lock critical section with a channel_mutex critical section
and extend the latter to include the loads of target_cpu; this same
pattern is also used in hv_synic_cleanup().

Signed-off-by: Andrea Parri (Microsoft) <parri.andrea@xxxxxxxxx>
---
 drivers/hv/vmbus_drv.c | 7 +++----
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/hv/vmbus_drv.c b/drivers/hv/vmbus_drv.c
index b5ae45eb8aef7..9e39692dc13ee 100644
--- a/drivers/hv/vmbus_drv.c
+++ b/drivers/hv/vmbus_drv.c
@@ -507,18 +507,17 @@ static ssize_t channel_vp_mapping_show(struct device *dev,
 {
 	struct hv_device *hv_dev = device_to_hv_device(dev);
 	struct vmbus_channel *channel = hv_dev->channel, *cur_sc;
-	unsigned long flags;
 	int buf_size = PAGE_SIZE, n_written, tot_written;
 	struct list_head *cur;
 
 	if (!channel)
 		return -ENODEV;
 
+	mutex_lock(&vmbus_connection.channel_mutex);
+
 	tot_written = snprintf(buf, buf_size, "%u:%u\n",
 		channel->offermsg.child_relid, channel->target_cpu);
 
-	spin_lock_irqsave(&channel->lock, flags);
-
 	list_for_each(cur, &channel->sc_list) {
 		if (tot_written >= buf_size - 1)
 			break;
@@ -532,7 +531,7 @@ static ssize_t channel_vp_mapping_show(struct device *dev,
 		tot_written += n_written;
 	}
 
-	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&channel->lock, flags);
+	mutex_unlock(&vmbus_connection.channel_mutex);
 
 	return tot_written;
 }
-- 
2.25.1