Re: [PATCH 1/4] staging: kpc2000: Unpin partial pinned pages
From: Dan Carpenter
Date: Thu Jun 18 2020 - 06:51:00 EST
On Thu, Jun 18, 2020 at 12:59:57AM +0530, Souptick Joarder wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 17, 2020 at 11:29 PM Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Jun 17, 2020 at 11:13:32PM +0530, Souptick Joarder wrote:
> > > On Wed, Jun 17, 2020 at 4:43 PM Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Wed, Jun 17, 2020 at 07:57:20AM +0530, Souptick Joarder wrote:
> > > > > There is a bug, when get_user_pages() failed but partially pinned
> > > > > pages are not unpinned. Fixed it.
> > > > >
> > > > > Also, int is more appropriate type for rv. Changed it.
> > > > >
> > > > > Signed-off-by: Souptick Joarder <jrdr.linux@xxxxxxxxx>
> > > > > Cc: John Hubbard <jhubbard@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > > Cc: Bharath Vedartham <linux.bhar@xxxxxxxxx>
> > > > > Cc: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > > ---
> > > > > drivers/staging/kpc2000/kpc_dma/fileops.c | 6 +++++-
> > > > > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > > > >
> > > > > diff --git a/drivers/staging/kpc2000/kpc_dma/fileops.c b/drivers/staging/kpc2000/kpc_dma/fileops.c
> > > > > index 8975346..b136353 100644
> > > > > --- a/drivers/staging/kpc2000/kpc_dma/fileops.c
> > > > > +++ b/drivers/staging/kpc2000/kpc_dma/fileops.c
> > > > > @@ -35,7 +35,7 @@ static int kpc_dma_transfer(struct dev_private_data *priv,
> > > > > unsigned long iov_base, size_t iov_len)
> > > > > {
> > > > > unsigned int i = 0;
> > > > > - long rv = 0;
> > > > > + int rv = 0;
> > > > > struct kpc_dma_device *ldev;
> > > > > struct aio_cb_data *acd;
> > > > > DECLARE_COMPLETION_ONSTACK(done);
> > > > > @@ -193,6 +193,10 @@ static int kpc_dma_transfer(struct dev_private_data *priv,
> > > > > put_page(acd->user_pages[i]);
> > > > ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> > > > >
> > > > > err_get_user_pages:
> > > > > + if (rv > 0) {
> > > > > + for (i = 0; i < rv; i++)
> > > > > + put_pages(acd->user_pages[i])
> > > > ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> > > >
> > > > > + }
> > > >
> > > > This isn't a complete fix. "rv" is the negative error code but here we
> > > > are returning a positive value on this path.
> > >
> > > In case of error of get_user_pages(), it will return -errno, 0 and 3rd one is
> > > (rv > 0 && rv != acd->page_count). When rv is -errno or 0 there is no need
> > > to call put_pages() in error path. But for 3rd case partially mapped pages
> > > need to unpin.
> > >
> > > Correct me if I am missing anything.
> > >
> >
> > 182 kfree(acd);
> > 183 }
> > 184 return rv;
> > 185
> > 186 err_descr_too_many:
> > 187 unlock_engine(ldev);
> > 188 dma_unmap_sg(&ldev->pldev->dev, acd->sgt.sgl, acd->sgt.nents, ldev->dir);
> > 189 sg_free_table(&acd->sgt);
> > 190 err_dma_map_sg:
> > 191 err_alloc_sg_table:
> > 192 for (i = 0 ; i < acd->page_count ; i++)
> > 193 put_page(acd->user_pages[i]);
> > 194
> > 195 err_get_user_pages:
> > 196 if (rv > 0) {
> > ^^^^^^
> > "rv" is positive.
> >
> > 197 for (i = 0; i < rv; i++)
> > 198 put_pages(acd->user_pages[i])
> > 199 }
> > 200 kfree(acd->user_pages);
> > 201 err_alloc_userpages:
> > 202 kfree(acd);
> > 203 dev_dbg(&priv->ldev->pldev->dev, "%s returning with error %ld\n", __func__, rv);
> > 204 return rv;
> > ^^
> > "rv" is still positive but it should be -EFAULT.
> >
>
> Ahh, my mistake. Will correct it in v2.
> Do other patches in the series looks good ?
The others will have to be re-worked if you change patch 1/4, especially
patch 4/4. But otherwise it seems okay with me.
regards,
dan carpenter