Re: [PATCH] irq: Request and release resources for chained IRQs

[Thomas Gleixner]

David Heidelberg <david@xxxxxxx> writes:
> is there chance to get this patch included or could be this issue 
> solved with different approach?

Included into what? This patch is incorrect as I pointed out in review
here:

  https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/alpine.DEB.2.21.1812071143480.14498@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/

So why are you even asking?

I recommended to switch this away from chained handler and then the
whole story ended with this mail:

  https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/alpine.DEB.2.21.1812071404140.14498@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/

I have no idea how the GPIO people solved that problem, but certainly
not by applying this.

Thanks,

        tglx