[PATCH 4.19 240/267] media: ov5640: fix use of destroyed mutex

[Greg Kroah-Hartman]

From: Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@xxxxxx>

commit bfcba38d95a0aed146a958a84a2177af1459eddc upstream.

v4l2_ctrl_handler_free() uses hdl->lock, which in ov5640 driver is set
to sensor's own sensor->lock. In ov5640_remove(), the driver destroys the
sensor->lock first, and then calls v4l2_ctrl_handler_free(), resulting
in the use of the destroyed mutex.

Fix this by calling moving the mutex_destroy() to the end of the cleanup
sequence, as there's no need to destroy the mutex as early as possible.

Signed-off-by: Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@xxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx # v4.14+
Reviewed-by: Benoit Parrot <bparrot@xxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

---
 drivers/media/i2c/ov5640.c |    4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

--- a/drivers/media/i2c/ov5640.c
+++ b/drivers/media/i2c/ov5640.c
@@ -2829,8 +2829,8 @@ static int ov5640_probe(struct i2c_clien
 free_ctrls:
 	v4l2_ctrl_handler_free(&sensor->ctrls.handler);
 entity_cleanup:
-	mutex_destroy(&sensor->lock);
 	media_entity_cleanup(&sensor->sd.entity);
+	mutex_destroy(&sensor->lock);
 	return ret;
 }
 
@@ -2840,9 +2840,9 @@ static int ov5640_remove(struct i2c_clie
 	struct ov5640_dev *sensor = to_ov5640_dev(sd);
 
 	v4l2_async_unregister_subdev(&sensor->sd);
-	mutex_destroy(&sensor->lock);
 	media_entity_cleanup(&sensor->sd.entity);
 	v4l2_ctrl_handler_free(&sensor->ctrls.handler);
+	mutex_destroy(&sensor->lock);
 
 	return 0;
 }