Re: [RFC PATCH v3 1/1] mmap_lock: add tracepoints around mmap_lock acquisition

[Axel Rasmussen]

On Fri, Jun 19, 2020 at 1:30 AM Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jun 18, 2020 at 03:22:25PM -0700, Axel Rasmussen wrote:
> > diff --git a/kernel/locking/rwsem.c b/kernel/locking/rwsem.c
> > index f11b9bd3431d..6aabea1cbc5d 100644
> > --- a/kernel/locking/rwsem.c
> > +++ b/kernel/locking/rwsem.c
> > @@ -1495,6 +1495,20 @@ void __sched down_read(struct rw_semaphore *sem)
> >  }
> >  EXPORT_SYMBOL(down_read);
> >
> > +/*
> > + * lock for reading
> > + */
> > +void __sched down_read_contended_hook(struct rw_semaphore *sem,
> > +                                   void (*pre)(void *),
> > +                                   void (*post)(void *), void *arg)
> > +{
> > +     might_sleep();
> > +     rwsem_acquire_read(&sem->dep_map, 0, 0, _RET_IP_);
> > +     LOCK_CONTENDED_HOOK(sem, __down_read_trylock, __down_read, pre, post,
> > +                         arg);
> > +}
> > +EXPORT_SYMBOL(down_read_contended_hook);
> > +
> >  int __sched down_read_killable(struct rw_semaphore *sem)
> >  {
> >       might_sleep();
> > @@ -1509,6 +1523,24 @@ int __sched down_read_killable(struct rw_semaphore *sem)
> >  }
> >  EXPORT_SYMBOL(down_read_killable);
> >
> > +int __sched down_read_killable_contended_hook(struct rw_semaphore *sem,
> > +                                           void (*pre)(void *),
> > +                                           void (*post)(void *, int),
> > +                                           void *arg)
> > +{
> > +     might_sleep();
> > +     rwsem_acquire_read(&sem->dep_map, 0, 0, _RET_IP_);
> > +
> > +     if (LOCK_CONTENDED_HOOK_RETURN(sem, __down_read_trylock,
> > +                                    __down_read_killable, pre, post, arg)) {
> > +             rwsem_release(&sem->dep_map, _RET_IP_);
> > +             return -EINTR;
> > +     }
> > +
> > +     return 0;
> > +}
> > +EXPORT_SYMBOL(down_read_killable_contended_hook);
> > +
> >  /*
> >   * trylock for reading -- returns 1 if successful, 0 if contention
> >   */
> > @@ -1533,6 +1565,20 @@ void __sched down_write(struct rw_semaphore *sem)
> >  }
> >  EXPORT_SYMBOL(down_write);
> >
> > +/*
> > + * lock for writing
> > + */
> > +void __sched down_write_contended_hook(struct rw_semaphore *sem,
> > +                                    void (*pre)(void *),
> > +                                    void (*post)(void *), void *arg)
> > +{
> > +     might_sleep();
> > +     rwsem_acquire(&sem->dep_map, 0, 0, _RET_IP_);
> > +     LOCK_CONTENDED_HOOK(sem, __down_write_trylock, __down_write, pre, post,
> > +                         arg);
> > +}
> > +EXPORT_SYMBOL(down_write_contended_hook);
> > +
> >  /*
> >   * lock for writing
> >   */
> > @@ -1551,6 +1597,24 @@ int __sched down_write_killable(struct rw_semaphore *sem)
> >  }
> >  EXPORT_SYMBOL(down_write_killable);
> >
> > +int __sched down_write_killable_contended_hook(struct rw_semaphore *sem,
> > +                                            void (*pre)(void *),
> > +                                            void (*post)(void *, int),
> > +                                            void *arg)
> > +{
> > +     might_sleep();
> > +     rwsem_acquire_read(&sem->dep_map, 0, 0, _RET_IP_);
> > +
> > +     if (LOCK_CONTENDED_HOOK_RETURN(sem, __down_write_trylock,
> > +                                    __down_write_killable, pre, post, arg)) {
> > +             rwsem_release(&sem->dep_map, _RET_IP_);
> > +             return -EINTR;
> > +     }
> > +
> > +     return 0;
> > +}
> > +EXPORT_SYMBOL(down_write_killable_contended_hook);
> > +
> >  /*
> >   * trylock for writing -- returns 1 if successful, 0 if contention
> >   */
>
> NAK, absolutely not going to happen. This is an atrocious API to expose,
> worse you're exporting.

Ack about splitting this up.

Thanks for taking a look. :)