[PATCH 4.9 075/128] exit: Move preemption fixup up, move blocking operations down

[Greg Kroah-Hartman]

From: Jann Horn <jannh@xxxxxxxxxx>

[ Upstream commit 586b58cac8b4683eb58a1446fbc399de18974e40 ]

With CONFIG_DEBUG_ATOMIC_SLEEP=y and CONFIG_CGROUPS=y, kernel oopses in
non-preemptible context look untidy; after the main oops, the kernel prints
a "sleeping function called from invalid context" report because
exit_signals() -> cgroup_threadgroup_change_begin() -> percpu_down_read()
can sleep, and that happens before the preempt_count_set(PREEMPT_ENABLED)
fixup.

It looks like the same thing applies to profile_task_exit() and
kcov_task_exit().

Fix it by moving the preemption fixup up and the calls to
profile_task_exit() and kcov_task_exit() down.

Fixes: 1dc0fffc48af ("sched/core: Robustify preemption leak checks")
Signed-off-by: Jann Horn <jannh@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200305220657.46800-1-jannh@xxxxxxxxxx
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
 kernel/exit.c | 25 ++++++++++++++++---------
 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/exit.c b/kernel/exit.c
index d9394fcd0e2c..27f4168eaeb1 100644
--- a/kernel/exit.c
+++ b/kernel/exit.c
@@ -739,8 +739,12 @@ void __noreturn do_exit(long code)
 	int group_dead;
 	TASKS_RCU(int tasks_rcu_i);
 
-	profile_task_exit(tsk);
-	kcov_task_exit(tsk);
+	/*
+	 * We can get here from a kernel oops, sometimes with preemption off.
+	 * Start by checking for critical errors.
+	 * Then fix up important state like USER_DS and preemption.
+	 * Then do everything else.
+	 */
 
 	WARN_ON(blk_needs_flush_plug(tsk));
 
@@ -758,6 +762,16 @@ void __noreturn do_exit(long code)
 	 */
 	set_fs(USER_DS);
 
+	if (unlikely(in_atomic())) {
+		pr_info("note: %s[%d] exited with preempt_count %d\n",
+			current->comm, task_pid_nr(current),
+			preempt_count());
+		preempt_count_set(PREEMPT_ENABLED);
+	}
+
+	profile_task_exit(tsk);
+	kcov_task_exit(tsk);
+
 	ptrace_event(PTRACE_EVENT_EXIT, code);
 
 	validate_creds_for_do_exit(tsk);
@@ -794,13 +808,6 @@ void __noreturn do_exit(long code)
 	 */
 	raw_spin_unlock_wait(&tsk->pi_lock);
 
-	if (unlikely(in_atomic())) {
-		pr_info("note: %s[%d] exited with preempt_count %d\n",
-			current->comm, task_pid_nr(current),
-			preempt_count());
-		preempt_count_set(PREEMPT_ENABLED);
-	}
-
 	/* sync mm's RSS info before statistics gathering */
 	if (tsk->mm)
 		sync_mm_rss(tsk->mm);
-- 
2.25.1