Re: [PATCH 3/3] rcu/trace: Add name of the source for gp_seq to prevent confusion

[Paul E. McKenney]

On Thu, Jun 18, 2020 at 10:07:18PM -0400, Joel Fernandes wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 18, 2020 at 09:36:41PM -0400, Joel Fernandes (Google) wrote:
> [...]
> > @@ -2019,7 +2019,7 @@ static int __noreturn rcu_gp_kthread(void *unused)
> >  			cond_resched_tasks_rcu_qs();
> >  			WRITE_ONCE(rcu_state.gp_activity, jiffies);
> >  			WARN_ON(signal_pending(current));
> > -			trace_rcu_grace_period(rcu_state.name, rcu_state.gp_seq,
> > +			trace_rcu_grace_period(rcu_state.name, TPS("rsp"), rcu_state.gp_seq,
> >  					       TPS("reqwaitsig"));
> >  		}
> >  
> > @@ -2263,7 +2263,7 @@ int rcutree_dying_cpu(unsigned int cpu)
> >  		return 0;
> >  
> >  	blkd = !!(rnp->qsmask & rdp->grpmask);
> > -	trace_rcu_grace_period(rcu_state.name, READ_ONCE(rnp->gp_seq),
> > +	trace_rcu_grace_period(rcu_state.name, TPS("rsp"), READ_ONCE(rnp->gp_seq),
> 
> This should be: TPS("rnp")  :-(
> 
> Happy to fix it up and resend if you'd like. Thanks!

I queued and pushed 1/2 and 2/2, but again, I am still not at all
convinced by 3/3.  If you want to make RCU trace output human
readable, post-processing will be needed.

						Thanx, Paul