Re: [PATCH 2/2] sched/uclamp: Protect uclamp fast path code with static key

[Peter Zijlstra]

On Fri, Jun 19, 2020 at 02:25:20PM +0100, Valentin Schneider wrote:
> 
> On 19/06/20 13:51, Qais Yousef wrote:
> > On 06/19/20 11:36, Valentin Schneider wrote:
> >>
> >> On 18/06/20 20:55, Qais Yousef wrote:
> >> > There is a report that when uclamp is enabled, a netperf UDP test
> >> > regresses compared to a kernel compiled without uclamp.
> >> >
> >> > https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20200529100806.GA3070@xxxxxxx/
> >> >
> >>
> >> ISTR the perennial form for those is: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/<message-id>
> >
> > The link is correct permalinnk from lore and contains the message-id as Peter
> > likes and he has accepted this form before.
> >
> 
> I think the objections I remember were on using lkml.org rather than
> lkml.kernel.org. Sorry!

:-) Yeah, lkml.org is bad.

That said, I prefer the lkml.kernel.org/r/ variant over
lore.kernel.org/lkml/ in part because it existed first and I'm lazy, in
part because it's shorter and in part because lkml.kernel.org/r/ is an
explicit redirect and lore is 'just' an archive it can redirect to
(although admittedly, it looks rather unlikely lore is going to die).

I'll not make a big point of it though and will in all likelyhood accept
lore links. The important point is that it has the MessageID in.