Re: [PATCH] .clang-format: update column limit

[Miguel Ojeda]

Hi Joe,

I didn't forget about this -- I was playing the other day with
`ColumnLimit: 0` and the new options up to LLVM 11 to see what we
could do... See below.

On Thu, Jun 11, 2020 at 9:26 PM Joe Perches <joe@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Hey again Miguel:
>
> A little script and some statistics:
>
> Today about 6% of all code lines are > 80 columns
>
> Oddities like the ~3% of all lines with 113 and 121 columns
> are machine generated.
>
> So realistically, < 3% of code is > 80 columns.

The data you show is very useful, thanks! Of course, the current set
of lines tends to be < 80 columns given the previous strongly
preferred limit, but I would expect that % to grow in the future.

By the way, the 20% figure I mentioned was w.r.t. the previous set of
lines that were already over 80 columns (not w.r.t. the total set).

Regarding the changes: `ColumnLimit: 0` could be a good compromise
(which makes `clang-format` respect as much as possible the current
line breaks) to let developers have more leeway. They would still get
warnings from your `checkpatch` etc. On the other hand, making
formatting dependent on the previous state is not something I am a fan
of, particularly for long-term efforts to move to `clang-format`
"completely".

I guess users of `clang-format` should speak up (w.r.t. `ColumnLimit:
100`, `ColumnLimit: 0` or no change). At the end of the day, this is
still just a tool and not enforced, and they can still override it, so
if people start submitting code with 200-wide lines, well, they still
can :-) Otherwise, let's leave it as it is for the moment and see what
is the output of the script in, say, a year.

Cheers,
Miguel