RE: [EXT] Re: [PATCH net-next v3 4/7] net: phy: add backplane kr driver support

[Florinel Iordache]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@xxxxxxx>
> Sent: Monday, June 22, 2020 5:25 PM
> To: Florinel Iordache <florinel.iordache@xxxxxxx>
> Cc: davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx; netdev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; f.fainelli@xxxxxxxxx;
> hkallweit1@xxxxxxxxx; linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; devicetree@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx;
> linux-doc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; robh+dt@xxxxxxxxxx; mark.rutland@xxxxxxx;
> kuba@xxxxxxxxxx; corbet@xxxxxxx; shawnguo@xxxxxxxxxx; Leo Li
> <leoyang.li@xxxxxxx>; Madalin Bucur (OSS) <madalin.bucur@xxxxxxxxxxx>;
> Ioana Ciornei <ioana.ciornei@xxxxxxx>; linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [EXT] Re: [PATCH net-next v3 4/7] net: phy: add backplane kr driver
> support
> 
> Caution: EXT Email
> 
> On Mon, Jun 22, 2020 at 04:35:21PM +0300, Florinel Iordache wrote:
> > Add support for backplane kr generic driver including link training
> > (ieee802.3ap/ba) and fixed equalization algorithm
> 
> Hi Florinel
> 
> This is still a PHY device. I don't remember any discussions which resolved the
> issues of if at the end of the backplane there is another PHY.
> 
> It makes little sense to repost this code until we have this problem discussed and
> a way forward decided on. It fits into the discussion Russell and Ioana are having
> about representing PCS drivers. Please contribute to that.
> 
>         Andrew

Hi Andrew,

Yes, you are right: we decided to send only support for DPAA1 using current approach as a PHY device
(as mentioned in cover-letter), until PCS representation will be fully clarified.
The entire DPAA2 support was removed for now, together with phylink changes.
DPAA1 maintainer (Madalin Bucur) agrees with current representation as a PHY device for DPAA1.
So we would like to have some discussions around this approach for DPAA1 only, as it seems suitable for us.

Regards,
Florinel.