Re: [PATCH] initrd: Remove erroneous comment

[Tom Rini]

On Mon, Jun 22, 2020 at 01:48:45PM -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> On 2020-06-22 13:40, Tom Rini wrote:
> > On Mon, Jun 22, 2020 at 01:02:16PM -0700, ron minnich wrote:
> > 
> >> The other thing you ought to consider fixing:
> >> initrd is documented as follows:
> >>
> >>         initrd=         [BOOT] Specify the location of the initial ramdisk
> >>
> >> for bootloaders only.
> >>
> >> UEFI consumes initrd from the command line as well. As ARM servers
> >> increasingly use UEFI, there may be situations in which the initrd
> >> option doesn't make its way to the kernel? I don't know, UEFI is such
> >> a black box to me. But I've seen this "initrd consumption" happen.
> >>
> >> Based on docs, and the growing use of bootloaders that are happy to
> >> consume initrd= and not pass it to the kernel, you might be better off
> >> trying to move to the new command line option anyway.
> >>
> >> IOW, this comment may not be what people want to see, but ... it might
> >> also be right. Or possibly changed to:
> >>
> >> /*
> >>  * The initrd keyword is in use today on ARM, PowerPC, and MIPS.
> >>  * It is also reserved for use by bootloaders such as UEFI and may
> >>  * be consumed by them and not passed on to the kernel.
> >>  * The documentation also shows it as reserved for bootloaders.
> >>  * It is advised to move to the initrdmem= option whereever possible.
> >>  */
> > 
> > Fair warning, one of the other hats I wear is the chief custodian of the
> > U-Boot project.
> > 
> > Note that on most architectures in modern times the device tree is used
> > to pass in initrd type information and "initrd=" on the command line is
> > quite legacy.
> > 
> > But what do you mean UEFI "consumes" initrd= ?  It's quite expected that
> > when you configure grub/syslinux/systemd-boot/whatever via extlinux.conf
> > or similar with "initrd /some/file" something reasonable happens to
> > read that in to memory and pass along the location to Linux (which can
> > vary from arch to arch, when not using device tree).  I guess looking at 
> > Documentation/x86/boot.rst is where treating initrd= as a file that
> > should be handled and ramdisk_image / ramdisk_size set came from.  I do
> > wonder what happens in the case of ARM/ARM64 + UEFI without device tree.
> > 
> 
> UEFI plus the in-kernel UEFI stub is, in some ways, a "bootloader" in
> the traditional sense. It is totally fair that we should update the
> documentation with this as a different case, though, because it is part
> of the kernel tree and so the kernel now has partial ownership of the
> namespace.
> 
> I suggest "STUB" for "in-kernel firmware stub" for this purpose; no need
> to restrict it to a specific firmware for the purpose of namespace
> reservation.

With a little bit of quick digging, yes, it would be good to document
and be very clear which things are reserved for (and how are treated by)
the in-kernel firmware stub or "kernel EFI stub" or whatever name is
best for drivers/firmware/efi/libstub/.  I forget the last time we tried
booting a linux kernel EFI stub rather than grub/etc over in U-Boot
under our EFI loader support but it's reasonable to expect that it work.
Thanks!

-- 
Tom

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature