Did you determine that special function calls were generally missing[PATCH v3 10/14 RESEND] irqchip/nvic: Fix potential resource leaksOh, I find this issue through code review, I have no test environment
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mips/1592984711-3130-11-git-send-email-yangtiezhu@xxxxxxxxxxx/
https://lore.kernel.org/patchwork/patch/1263191/
Can it matter to omit the word âpotentialâ from change descriptions
after you detected that specific function calls were missing
in if branches?
to trigger the error path, but I think it is better to release the resource
in the error path, so I use "potential" description.
in error cases?
Were any known software analysis tools involved for the detection of
questionable source code places?
Regards,
Markus