Re: linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s390x (bisected)

From: Christoph Hellwig
Date: Wed Jun 24 2020 - 10:44:18 EST

Next message: Andrzej Hajda: "Re: [RESEND PATCH v5 3/5] drivers core: allow probe_err accept integer and pointer types"
Previous message: Alexander Gordeev: "Re: [PATCH V3 0/4] mm/debug_vm_pgtable: Add some more tests"
In reply to: Luis Chamberlain: "Re: linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s390x (bisected)"
Next in thread: Christian Borntraeger: "Re: linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s390x (bisected)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Wed, Jun 24, 2020 at 01:11:54PM +0200, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
> Does anyone have an idea why "umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used" breaks the
> linux-bridge on s390?

Are we even sure this is s390 specific and doesn't happen on other
architectures with the same bridge setup?

Next message: Andrzej Hajda: "Re: [RESEND PATCH v5 3/5] drivers core: allow probe_err accept integer and pointer types"
Previous message: Alexander Gordeev: "Re: [PATCH V3 0/4] mm/debug_vm_pgtable: Add some more tests"
In reply to: Luis Chamberlain: "Re: linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s390x (bisected)"
Next in thread: Christian Borntraeger: "Re: linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s390x (bisected)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]