Re: [PATCH drivers/misc 0/4] lkdtm: Various clean ups

[Richard Weinberger]

On Wed, Jun 24, 2020 at 11:29 PM Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On 6/24/20 1:36 PM, Kees Cook wrote:
> > On Wed, Jun 24, 2020 at 09:23:25AM +0200, Richard Weinberger wrote:
> >> ----- UrsprÃngliche Mail -----
> >>>>> Regardless, it seems arch/x86/um/asm/desc.h is not needed any more?
> >>>
> >>>> True that, we can rip the file.
> >>>
> >>> Has anyone fixed the uml build errors?
> >>
> >> I didn't realize that this is a super urgent issue. ;-)
> >>
> >> Kees, if you want you can carry a patch in your series, I'll ack it.
> >> Otherwise I can also do a patch and bring it via the uml tree upstream
> >> as soon more fixes queued up.
> >
> > I think the lkdtm change will tweak this bug, so I'm happy to carry the
> > patch (I just haven't had time to create and test one). Is it really
> > just as simple as removing arch/x86/um/asm/desc.h?
> >
>
> I just tried that and the build is still failing, so No, it's not that simple.
>
> But thanks for offering.
>
> I'll just ignore the UML build errors for now.

This is a allyesconfig?
I just gave CONFIG_LKDTM=y a try, builds fine here.

But the desc.h in uml is still in vain and can be deleted AFAICT.

-- 
Thanks,
//richard