Re: linux-next: Fixes tag needs some work in the block tree

[Pavel Begunkov]

On 27/06/2020 08:01, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Konstantin,
> 
> On Fri, 26 Jun 2020 21:56:05 -0400 Konstantin Ryabitsev <konstantin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, Jun 26, 2020 at 07:32:15PM -0600, Jens Axboe wrote:
>>> On 6/26/20 5:07 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:  
>>>> Hi all,
>>>>
>>>> In commit
>>>>
>>>>   cd664b0e35cb ("io_uring: fix hanging iopoll in case of -EAGAIN")
>>>>
>>>> Fixes tag
>>>>
>>>>   Fixes: bbde017a32b3 ("io_uring: add memory barrier to synchronize
>>>>
>>>> has these problem(s):
>>>>
>>>>   - Subject has leading but no trailing parentheses
>>>>   - Subject has leading but no trailing quotes
>>>>
>>>> Please do not split Fixes tags over more than one line.  
>>>
>>> Gah, that's b4 messing it up. I've actually seen this before, but
>>> I caught it. If you look at the actual commit, this is what the b4
>>> output ends up being for the fixes line:
>>>
>>> [snip]
>>> io_kiocb's result and iopoll_completed")
>>>
>>> Fixes: bbde017a32b3 ("io_uring: add memory barrier to synchronize
>>>
>>> even though it's correct in the email. I'm guessing some issue having to
>>> do with the longer line?  
>>
>> Yeah, I'll try to see if there's something I can do here, but it's going 
>> to be largely guesswork. Here's the original email:
>>
>> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/22111b29e298f5f606130fcf4307bda99dbec089.1593077359.git.asml.silence@xxxxxxxxx/raw
>>
>> The Fixes: footer really does get split into two. It's not that hard to 
>> add logic just for the Fixes tag (since it conveniently follows a set 
>> pattern), but finding a universal fix for split footers will be more 
>> difficult.
>>
>> I'll see what I can do.
> 
> But (what am I missing?) the Fixes: tag has been split over 2 lines in
> the original message ... on lore and my copy.  There is nothing for b4
> to do here, the author needs to do this right.

Yes, it was split from the beginning. It's really a shame it can't handle
multi-line tags, but well, I'll keep that in mind.

Though, it's curious how

```
Fixes ("line1
line2")
```

became 
```
line2")

Fixes ("line1
```

And that's what the rest of the thread is about.

-- 
Pavel Begunkov