On Wed, Jun 24, 2020 at 11:12:45AM -0700, Matthias Kaehlcke wrote:
On Wed, Jun 24, 2020 at 07:00:05PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
On Wed, Jun 24, 2020 at 10:55:36AM -0700, Matthias Kaehlcke wrote:
On Wed, Jun 24, 2020 at 06:44:17PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
Wait, so *some* of the series should go together but not other bits?
But you want them split up for some reason?
Yes, this will almost certainly be the case, even if not for this patch.
I brought this up earlier (https://patchwork.kernel.org/cover/11604623/#23428709).
I'm not really reading any of this stuff for the series as a whole, as
far as I could tell I'd reviewed all my bits and was hoping whatever
random platform stuff needs sorting out was going to be sorted out so I
stopped getting copied on revisions :(
Sorry this caused you extra work, I only fully realized this when the series
was basically ready to land :(
Avoiding unnecessary revision spam is another good reason to not combine
technically unrelated patches in a single series.
If I notice similar series in the future I'll try to bring it up early.
For the QSPI patch you could argue to just take it through QCOM since the SPI
patch of this series goes through this tree, up to you, I just want to make
sure everybody is on the same page.
If there are some part of this that don't have a connection with the
rest of the series and should be applied separately please split them
out and send them separately so it's clear what's going on.
Rajendra, IIUC you have to re-spin this series anyway, please split it
up in self-contained chunks.
One more thing: when you do the split it seems it would make sense to
include the DT changes that were initially part of this series
(https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-arm-msm/list/?series=278691&state=*)