Re: [PATCH 5/5] mfd: axp20x-i2c: Do not define 'struct acpi_device_id' when !CONFIG_ACPI

[Chen-Yu Tsai]

Adding Hans to the list as he's the one that deals with all the x86
platforms that use this series of chips.

On Mon, Jun 29, 2020 at 8:32 PM Lee Jones <lee.jones@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Since ACPI_PTR() is used to NULLify the value when !CONFIG_ACPI,
> struct axp20x_i2c_acpi_match becomes defined by unused.
>
> This squashes the current W=1 kernel builds warning:
>
>  drivers/mfd/axp20x-i2c.c:82:36: warning: âaxp20x_i2c_acpi_matchâ defined but not used [-Wunused-const-variable=]
>
> Cc: Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@xxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Carlo Caione <carlo@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  drivers/mfd/axp20x-i2c.c | 2 ++
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mfd/axp20x-i2c.c b/drivers/mfd/axp20x-i2c.c
> index 14f9df74f855c..3dd650125c239 100644
> --- a/drivers/mfd/axp20x-i2c.c
> +++ b/drivers/mfd/axp20x-i2c.c
> @@ -79,6 +79,7 @@ static const struct i2c_device_id axp20x_i2c_id[] = {
>  };
>  MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(i2c, axp20x_i2c_id);
>
> +#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ACPI)
>  static const struct acpi_device_id axp20x_i2c_acpi_match[] = {

I'd rather use "__maybe_unused" if possible to at least get a compile
check, and also because "ACPI_PTR NULLifies the value" might not be
well known to people not working on ACPI-based platforms.

Either way,

Acked-by: Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@xxxxxxxx>


>         {
>                 .id = "INT33F4",
> @@ -87,6 +88,7 @@ static const struct acpi_device_id axp20x_i2c_acpi_match[] = {
>         { },
>  };
>  MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(acpi, axp20x_i2c_acpi_match);
> +#endif
>
>  static struct i2c_driver axp20x_i2c_driver = {
>         .driver = {
> --
> 2.25.1
>