Hi Alexander,Fine. I can easily make a v2 patch, but first...
thanks for trying to fix this, yet I have some doubts.
On Mon, Jun 29, 2020 at 10:31:21PM +0200, Alexander A. Klimov wrote:
Rationale:
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-doc/20200626110706.7b5d4a38@xxxxxxx/
I think we need some text here. Clicking on a link to understand what a
patch is about is not comfortable. You can add the link with a Link: tag
for additional information.
If we shall not remove *this link*, maybe we shall not remove *all links*?
Removing stale email addresses may have some value, but removing...
Compaq's Bootldr + John Dorsey's patch for Assabet support
-(http://www.handhelds.org/Compaq/bootldr.html)
... information like this is not good. 'Wayback machine' still has
copies in case someone wants to look at where the infos came from.
What for? An email address is for someone who'd like to send an email to it. At the moment handhelds.org doesn't even have an MX record.
- * Copyright 2004-2005 Phil Blundell <pb@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
+ * Copyright 2004-2005 Phil Blundell
This is an OK case in my book...
-MODULE_AUTHOR("Phil Blundell <pb@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>");
+MODULE_AUTHOR("Phil Blundell");
... same here ...
@@ -435,7 +435,6 @@
case a PCI bridge (DEC chip 21152). The value of
'pb' is now only initialized if a de4x5 chip is
present.
- <france@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
This is kind of a signature and should be kept IMO.
Again: What for? For visiting it and thinking like damn, it's gone?
* 2001/07/23: <rmk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- * - Hand merge version from handhelds.org CVS tree. See patch
+ * - Hand merge version from CVS tree. See patch
That information may be useful.
IMAO the CREDITS file is for (c) headers.
/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only */
/* -*- linux-c -*-
- *
- * (C) 2003 zecke@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Removing copyright is a bad idea.
Probably some comment blocks are cruft meanwhile and can be removed as a
whole. That can be discussed. But removing only the handhelds.org part
makes most parts worse IMHO.
Thanks and happy hacking,
Wolfram