Re: [PATCH 4.9 00/59] 4.9.226-rc2 review

[Pavel Machek]

Hi!

> >FWIW, if we need/want to use unified assembler in v4.9.y, shouldn't all unified
> >assembler patches be applied ?
> 
> We don't - I took 71f8af111010 as a dependency rather than on its own
> merit.

Would it be possible to somehow mark patches that are "dependency"
rather than "on their own"? It would make review easier...

Thanks,
									Pavel
-- 
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature