Re: [PATCH v2] cpufreq: CPPC: fix some unreasonable codes in cppc_cpufreq_perf_to_khz()

[Viresh Kumar]

On 01-07-20, 11:26, Xin Hao wrote:
>  The 'caps' variable has been defined, so there is no need to get
>  'highest_perf' value through 'cpu->caps.highest_perf', you can use
>  'caps->highest_perf' instead.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Xin Hao <xhao@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  drivers/cpufreq/cppc_cpufreq.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cppc_cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cppc_cpufreq.c
> index 257d726a4456..444ee76a6bae 100644
> --- a/drivers/cpufreq/cppc_cpufreq.c
> +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cppc_cpufreq.c
> @@ -161,7 +161,7 @@ static unsigned int cppc_cpufreq_perf_to_khz(struct cppc_cpudata *cpu,
>  		if (!max_khz)
>  			max_khz = cppc_get_dmi_max_khz();
>  		mul = max_khz;
> -		div = cpu->perf_caps.highest_perf;
> +		div = caps->highest_perf;
>  	}
>  	return (u64)perf * mul / div;
>  }

Applied. Thanks.

-- 
viresh