Re: [PATCH v4 1/1] mfd: Add I2C based System Configuaration (SYSCON) access
From: Lee Jones
Date: Wed Jul 01 2020 - 03:04:43 EST
On Wed, 01 Jul 2020, Michael Walle wrote:
> Hi Lee,
>
> Am 2020-06-30 11:16, schrieb Michael Walle:
> > I'm just trying to use this for my sl28 driver. Some remarks, see below.
> >
> > Am 2020-06-22 09:51, schrieb Lee Jones:
> > > The existing SYSCON implementation only supports MMIO (memory mapped)
> > > accesses, facilitated by Regmap. This extends support for registers
> > > held behind I2C busses.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > > ---
> > > Changelog:
> > >
> > > v3 => v4
> > > - Add ability to provide a non-default Regmap configuration
> > >
> > > v2 => v3
> > > - Change 'is CONFIG' present check to include loadable modules
> > > - s/#ifdef CONFIG_MFD_SYSCON_I2C/#if
> > > IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_MFD_SYSCON_I2C)/
> > >
> > > v1 => v2
> > > - Remove legacy references to OF
> > > - Allow building as a module (fixes h8300 0-day issue)
> > >
> > > drivers/mfd/Kconfig | 7 +++
> > > drivers/mfd/Makefile | 1 +
> > > drivers/mfd/syscon-i2c.c | 104
> > > +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > > include/linux/mfd/syscon-i2c.h | 36 ++++++++++++
> > > 4 files changed, 148 insertions(+)
> > > create mode 100644 drivers/mfd/syscon-i2c.c
> > > create mode 100644 include/linux/mfd/syscon-i2c.h
> > >
> >
> > [..]
> >
> > > +static struct regmap *syscon_i2c_get_regmap(struct i2c_client
> > > *client,
> > > + struct regmap_config *regmap_config)
> > > +{
> > > + struct device *dev = &client->dev;
> > > + struct syscon *entry, *syscon = NULL;
> > > +
> > > + spin_lock(&syscon_i2c_list_slock);
> > > +
> > > + list_for_each_entry(entry, &syscon_i2c_list, list)
> > > + if (entry->dev == dev) {
> > > + syscon = entry;
> > > + break;
> > > + }
> > > +
> > > + spin_unlock(&syscon_i2c_list_slock);
> > > +
> > > + if (!syscon)
> > > + syscon = syscon_i2c_register(client, regmap_config);
> > > +
> > > + if (IS_ERR(syscon))
> > > + return ERR_CAST(syscon);
> > > +
> > > + return syscon->regmap;
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > +struct regmap *syscon_i2c_to_regmap_config(struct i2c_client *client,
> > > + struct regmap_config *regmap_config)
> > > +{
> > > + return syscon_i2c_get_regmap(client, regmap_config);
> > > +}
> > > +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(syscon_i2c_to_regmap_config);
> > > +
> > > +struct regmap *syscon_i2c_to_regmap(struct i2c_client *client)
> > > +{
> > > + return syscon_i2c_get_regmap(client, &syscon_i2c_regmap_config);
> > > +}
> > > +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(syscon_i2c_to_regmap);
> >
> > What do you think about
> >
> > struct regmap *syscon_i2c_to_regmap(struct device *dev)
> > {
> > struct i2c_client *client = i2c_verify_client(dev);
> >
> > if (!client)
> > return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
> >
> > return syscon_i2c_get_regmap(client, &syscon_i2c_regmap_config);
> > }
> >
> > Or even move it to syscon_i2c_get_regmap().
> >
> > This way, (a) a driver doesn't have to use "#include <linux/i2c.h>" just
> > to call to_i2c_client() (or i2c_verify_client()) and (b) you won't do it
> > all over again in all sub drivers.
> >
> > So you could just do a
> > regmap = syscon_i2c_to_regmap(pdev->dev.parent);
> >
> > I've also noticed that the mmio syscon uses device_node as parameter.
> > What
> > was the reason to divert from that? Just curious.
>
> How is this supposed to be used?
>
> I had something like the following in mind:
>
> &i2c {
> cpld@4a {
> compatible = "simple-mfd";
> reg = <0x4a>;
>
> gpio@4 {
> compatible = "vendor,gpio";
> reg = <0x4>;
> };
> };
> };
Yes, that was the idea.
> But I think the childen are not enumerated if its an I2C device. And
> the actual i2c driver is also missing.
What do you mean? Can you elaborate?
--
Lee Jones [æçæ]
Senior Technical Lead - Developer Services
Linaro.org â Open source software for Arm SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog