Re: [PATCH] phy: zynqmp: Fix unused-function compiler warning

[Vinod Koul]

Hi Laurent,

On 01-07-20, 16:44, Laurent Pinchart wrote:

> > How about marking it as __maybe_unused instead?
> 
> I don't mind either, I'll let Tobias decide, but his patch seems fine,
> is there a drawback in his approach ? If it's just a matter of personal
> preference, I'd rather not require a v2.

__maybe_unused is the preferred way to do as Documented in
Documentation/process/coding-style.rst and makes code look neater..

Thanks
-- 
~Vinod