Re: exfatprogs-1.0.3 version released

[Hyunchul Lee]

Hello Sedat,

For v1.0.3 and later releases, we can provide tar.xz tarballs, hashes
and detached signatures.
But is there a reason why hashes are required despite the signature?

We will let you know when it's done.

Thanks.

Regards,
Hyunchul

2020ë 6ì 30ì (í) ìí 7:16, Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxx>ëì ìì:
>
> On Tue, May 12, 2020 at 10:17 AM Namjae Jeon <namjae.jeon@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > Hi folk,
> >
> > We have released exfatprogs-1.0.3 version.
> > Any feedback is welcome!:)
> >
> > CHANGES :
> >  * Rename label.exfat to tune.exfat.
> >  * tune.exfat: change argument style(-l option for print level,
> >    -L option for setting label)
> >  * mkfs.exfat: harmonize set volume label option with tune.exfat.
> >
> > NEW FEATURES :
> >  * Add man page.
> >
> > BUG FIXES :
> >  * Fix the reported build warnings/errors.
> >  * Add memset to clean garbage in allocation.
> >  * Fix wrong volume label array size.
> >  * Open a device using O_EXCL to avoid formatting it while it is mounted.
> >  * Fix incomplete "make dist" generated tarball.
> >
> > The git tree is at:
> >       https://github.com/exfatprogs/exfatprogs
> >
> > The tarballs can be found at:
> >       https://github.com/exfatprogs/exfatprogs/releases/download/1.0.3/exfatprogs-1.0.3.tar.gz
> >
>
> Hi,
>
> thanks for the upgrade.
>
> Today, I contacted the Debian maintainer on how he wants to
> distinguish between exfat-utils vs. exfatprogs as Linux v5.7 entered
> Debian/unstable.
>
> When I looked at the release/tags page on github:
>
> Can you please offer tar.xz tarballs, please?
> Hashes? Like sha256sum
> Signing keys? (Signed tarballs?)
>
> Thanks.
>
> Regards,
> - Sedat -