Re: [PATCH v3 3/7] iommu/vt-d: Fix PASID devTLB invalidation

[Auger Eric]

Hi Jacob,

On 7/1/20 5:33 PM, Jacob Pan wrote:
> DevTLB flush can be used for both DMA request with and without PASIDs.
> The former uses PASID#0 (RID2PASID), latter uses non-zero PASID for SVA
> usage.
> 
> This patch adds a check for PASID value such that devTLB flush with
> PASID is used for SVA case. This is more efficient in that multiple
> PASIDs can be used by a single device, when tearing down a PASID entry
> we shall flush only the devTLB specific to a PASID.
> 
> Fixes: 6f7db75e1c46 ("iommu/vt-d: Add second level page table")
> Signed-off-by: Jacob Pan <jacob.jun.pan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Eric Auger <eric.auger@xxxxxxxxxx>

Thanks

Eric
> ---
>  drivers/iommu/intel/pasid.c | 11 ++++++++++-
>  1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/intel/pasid.c b/drivers/iommu/intel/pasid.c
> index c81f0f17c6ba..fa0154cce537 100644
> --- a/drivers/iommu/intel/pasid.c
> +++ b/drivers/iommu/intel/pasid.c
> @@ -486,7 +486,16 @@ devtlb_invalidation_with_pasid(struct intel_iommu *iommu,
>  	qdep = info->ats_qdep;
>  	pfsid = info->pfsid;
>  
> -	qi_flush_dev_iotlb(iommu, sid, pfsid, qdep, 0, 64 - VTD_PAGE_SHIFT);
> +	/*
> +	 * When PASID 0 is used, it indicates RID2PASID(DMA request w/o PASID),
> +	 * devTLB flush w/o PASID should be used. For non-zero PASID under
> +	 * SVA usage, device could do DMA with multiple PASIDs. It is more
> +	 * efficient to flush devTLB specific to the PASID.
> +	 */
> +	if (pasid == PASID_RID2PASID)
> +		qi_flush_dev_iotlb(iommu, sid, pfsid, qdep, 0, 64 - VTD_PAGE_SHIFT);
> +	else
> +		qi_flush_dev_iotlb_pasid(iommu, sid, pfsid, pasid, qdep, 0, 64 - VTD_PAGE_SHIFT);
>  }
>  
>  void intel_pasid_tear_down_entry(struct intel_iommu *iommu, struct device *dev,
>