[GIT PULL] Kunit fixes update for Linux 5.8-rc4
From: Shuah Khan
Date: Thu Jul 02 2020 - 11:24:03 EST
Hi Linus,
Please pull the following Kunit fixes update for Linux 5.8-rc4.
This kunit fixes update for Linux 5.8-rc4 consists of fixes to build
and run-times failures. Also includes troubleshooting tips updates
to kunit user documentation.
These tips in the doc patch helped me with my test runs.
diff is included.
thanks,
-- Shuah
----------------------------------------------------------------
The following changes since commit 48778464bb7d346b47157d21ffde2af6b2d39110:
Linux 5.8-rc2 (2020-06-21 15:45:29 -0700)
are available in the Git repository at:
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/shuah/linux-kselftest
tags/linux-kselftest-kunit-fixes-5.8-rc4
for you to fetch changes up to c63d2dd7e134ebddce4745c51f9572b3f0d92b26:
Documentation: kunit: Add some troubleshooting tips to the FAQ
(2020-06-26 14:29:55 -0600)
----------------------------------------------------------------
linux-kselftest-kunit-fixes-5.8-rc4
This kunit fixes update for Linux 5.8-rc4 consists of fixes to build
and run-times failures. Also includes troubleshooting tips updates
to kunit user documentation.
----------------------------------------------------------------
David Gow (2):
kunit: kunit_tool: Fix invalid result when build fails
Documentation: kunit: Add some troubleshooting tips to the FAQ
Rikard Falkeborn (1):
kunit: kunit_config: Fix parsing of CONFIG options with space
Uriel Guajardo (1):
kunit: show error if kunit results are not present
Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/faq.rst | 40
+++++++++++++++++++++
tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py | 4 ++-
tools/testing/kunit/kunit_config.py | 2 +-
tools/testing/kunit/kunit_parser.py | 8 ++---
tools/testing/kunit/kunit_tool_test.py | 11 ++++++
.../kunit/test_data/test_insufficient_memory.log | Bin
6 files changed, 59 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
create mode 100644
tools/testing/kunit/test_data/test_insufficient_memory.log
----------------------------------------------------------------
diff --git a/Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/faq.rst b/Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/faq.rst
index ea55b2467653..1628862e7024 100644
--- a/Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/faq.rst
+++ b/Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/faq.rst
@@ -61,3 +61,43 @@ test, or an end-to-end test.
kernel by installing a production configuration of the kernel on production
hardware with a production userspace and then trying to exercise some behavior
that depends on interactions between the hardware, the kernel, and userspace.
+
+KUnit isn't working, what should I do?
+======================================
+
+Unfortunately, there are a number of things which can break, but here are some
+things to try.
+
+1. Try running ``./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run`` with the ``--raw_output``
+ parameter. This might show details or error messages hidden by the kunit_tool
+ parser.
+2. Instead of running ``kunit.py run``, try running ``kunit.py config``,
+ ``kunit.py build``, and ``kunit.py exec`` independently. This can help track
+ down where an issue is occurring. (If you think the parser is at fault, you
+ can run it manually against stdin or a file with ``kunit.py parse``.)
+3. Running the UML kernel directly can often reveal issues or error messages
+ kunit_tool ignores. This should be as simple as running ``./vmlinux`` after
+ building the UML kernel (e.g., by using ``kunit.py build``). Note that UML
+ has some unusual requirements (such as the host having a tmpfs filesystem
+ mounted), and has had issues in the past when built statically and the host
+ has KASLR enabled. (On older host kernels, you may need to run ``setarch
+ `uname -m` -R ./vmlinux`` to disable KASLR.)
+4. Make sure the kernel .config has ``CONFIG_KUNIT=y`` and at least one test
+ (e.g. ``CONFIG_KUNIT_EXAMPLE_TEST=y``). kunit_tool will keep its .config
+ around, so you can see what config was used after running ``kunit.py run``.
+ It also preserves any config changes you might make, so you can
+ enable/disable things with ``make ARCH=um menuconfig`` or similar, and then
+ re-run kunit_tool.
+5. Try to run ``make ARCH=um defconfig`` before running ``kunit.py run``. This
+ may help clean up any residual config items which could be causing problems.
+6. Finally, try running KUnit outside UML. KUnit and KUnit tests can run be
+ built into any kernel, or can be built as a module and loaded at runtime.
+ Doing so should allow you to determine if UML is causing the issue you're
+ seeing. When tests are built-in, they will execute when the kernel boots, and
+ modules will automatically execute associated tests when loaded. Test results
+ can be collected from ``/sys/kernel/debug/kunit/<test suite>/results``, and
+ can be parsed with ``kunit.py parse``. For more details, see "KUnit on
+ non-UML architectures" in :doc:`usage`.
+
+If none of the above tricks help, you are always welcome to email any issues to
+kunit-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
diff --git a/tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py b/tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py
index 787b6d4ad716..f9b769f3437d 100755
--- a/tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py
+++ b/tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py
@@ -82,7 +82,9 @@ def build_tests(linux: kunit_kernel.LinuxSourceTree,
request.make_options)
build_end = time.time()
if not success:
- return KunitResult(KunitStatus.BUILD_FAILURE, 'could not build kernel')
+ return KunitResult(KunitStatus.BUILD_FAILURE,
+ 'could not build kernel',
+ build_end - build_start)
if not success:
return KunitResult(KunitStatus.BUILD_FAILURE,
'could not build kernel',
diff --git a/tools/testing/kunit/kunit_config.py b/tools/testing/kunit/kunit_config.py
index e75063d603b5..02ffc3a3e5dc 100644
--- a/tools/testing/kunit/kunit_config.py
+++ b/tools/testing/kunit/kunit_config.py
@@ -10,7 +10,7 @@ import collections
import re
CONFIG_IS_NOT_SET_PATTERN = r'^# CONFIG_(\w+) is not set$'
-CONFIG_PATTERN = r'^CONFIG_(\w+)=(\S+)$'
+CONFIG_PATTERN = r'^CONFIG_(\w+)=(\S+|".*")$'
KconfigEntryBase = collections.namedtuple('KconfigEntry', ['name', 'value'])
diff --git a/tools/testing/kunit/kunit_parser.py b/tools/testing/kunit/kunit_parser.py
index 64aac9dcd431..f13e0c0d6663 100644
--- a/tools/testing/kunit/kunit_parser.py
+++ b/tools/testing/kunit/kunit_parser.py
@@ -265,11 +265,9 @@ def bubble_up_suite_errors(test_suite_list: List[TestSuite]) -> TestStatus:
return bubble_up_errors(lambda x: x.status, test_suite_list)
def parse_test_result(lines: List[str]) -> TestResult:
- if not lines:
- return TestResult(TestStatus.NO_TESTS, [], lines)
consume_non_diagnositic(lines)
- if not parse_tap_header(lines):
- return None
+ if not lines or not parse_tap_header(lines):
+ return TestResult(TestStatus.NO_TESTS, [], lines)
test_suites = []
test_suite = parse_test_suite(lines)
while test_suite:
@@ -282,6 +280,8 @@ def parse_run_tests(kernel_output) -> TestResult:
failed_tests = 0
crashed_tests = 0
test_result = parse_test_result(list(isolate_kunit_output(kernel_output)))
+ if test_result.status == TestStatus.NO_TESTS:
+ print_with_timestamp(red('[ERROR] ') + 'no kunit output detected')
for test_suite in test_result.suites:
if test_suite.status == TestStatus.SUCCESS:
print_suite_divider(green('[PASSED] ') + test_suite.name)
diff --git a/tools/testing/kunit/kunit_tool_test.py b/tools/testing/kunit/kunit_tool_test.py
index 5bb7b118ebd9..f9eeaea94cad 100755
--- a/tools/testing/kunit/kunit_tool_test.py
+++ b/tools/testing/kunit/kunit_tool_test.py
@@ -170,6 +170,17 @@ class KUnitParserTest(unittest.TestCase):
result.status)
file.close()
+ def test_no_kunit_output(self):
+ crash_log = get_absolute_path(
+ 'test_data/test_insufficient_memory.log')
+ file = open(crash_log)
+ print_mock = mock.patch('builtins.print').start()
+ result = kunit_parser.parse_run_tests(
+ kunit_parser.isolate_kunit_output(file.readlines()))
+ print_mock.assert_any_call(StrContains("no kunit output detected"))
+ print_mock.stop()
+ file.close()
+
def test_crashed_test(self):
crashed_log = get_absolute_path(
'test_data/test_is_test_passed-crash.log')
diff --git a/tools/testing/kunit/test_data/test_insufficient_memory.log b/tools/testing/kunit/test_data/test_insufficient_memory.log
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..e69de29bb2d1