[PATCH 2/2] Documentation: RCU: Requirements: drop doubled words

[Randy Dunlap]

Drop the doubled words "to" and "for".

Signed-off-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@xxxxxxx>
Cc: linux-doc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Josh Triplett <josh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Joel Fernandes <joel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: rcu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
---
 Documentation/RCU/Design/Requirements/Requirements.rst |    4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

--- linux-next-20200701.orig/Documentation/RCU/Design/Requirements/Requirements.rst
+++ linux-next-20200701/Documentation/RCU/Design/Requirements/Requirements.rst
@@ -2162,7 +2162,7 @@ scheduling-clock interrupt be enabled wh
    this sort of thing.
 #. If a CPU is in a portion of the kernel that is absolutely positively
    no-joking guaranteed to never execute any RCU read-side critical
-   sections, and RCU believes this CPU to to be idle, no problem. This
+   sections, and RCU believes this CPU to be idle, no problem. This
    sort of thing is used by some architectures for light-weight
    exception handlers, which can then avoid the overhead of
    ``rcu_irq_enter()`` and ``rcu_irq_exit()`` at exception entry and
@@ -2431,7 +2431,7 @@ However, there are legitimate preemptibl
 not have this property, given that any point in the code outside of an
 RCU read-side critical section can be a quiescent state. Therefore,
 *RCU-sched* was created, which follows âclassicâ RCU in that an
-RCU-sched grace period waits for for pre-existing interrupt and NMI
+RCU-sched grace period waits for pre-existing interrupt and NMI
 handlers. In kernels built with ``CONFIG_PREEMPT=n``, the RCU and
 RCU-sched APIs have identical implementations, while kernels built with
 ``CONFIG_PREEMPT=y`` provide a separate implementation for each.