Re: [PATCH] btfrs: initialize return of btrfs_extent_same

[Nikolay Borisov]

On 5.07.20 Ð. 17:20 Ñ., trix@xxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> From: Tom Rix <trix@xxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> clang static analysis flags a garbage return
> 
> fs/btrfs/reflink.c:611:2: warning: Undefined or garbage value returned to caller [core.uninitialized.UndefReturn]
>         return ret;
>         ^~~~~~~~~~
> ret will not be set when olen is 0
> When olen is 0, this function does no work.
> 
> So initialize ret to 0
> 
> Signed-off-by: Tom Rix <trix@xxxxxxxxxx>

Patch itself is good however, the bug cannot currently be triggered, due
to the following code in the sole caller (btrfs_remap_file_range):



   15         if (ret < 0 || len == 0)

   14                 goto out_unlock;

   13

   12         if (remap_flags & REMAP_FILE_DEDUP)

   11                 ret = btrfs_extent_same(src_inode, off, len,
dst_inode, destoff);
   10         else

    9                 ret = btrfs_clone_files(dst_file, src_file, off,
len, destoff);



i.e len is guaranteed to be non-zero

> ---
>  fs/btrfs/reflink.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/reflink.c b/fs/btrfs/reflink.c
> index 040009d1cc31..200a80fcbecb 100644
> --- a/fs/btrfs/reflink.c
> +++ b/fs/btrfs/reflink.c
> @@ -572,7 +572,7 @@ static int btrfs_extent_same_range(struct inode *src, u64 loff, u64 len,
>  static int btrfs_extent_same(struct inode *src, u64 loff, u64 olen,
>  			     struct inode *dst, u64 dst_loff)
>  {
> -	int ret;
> +	int ret = 0;
>  	u64 i, tail_len, chunk_count;
>  	struct btrfs_root *root_dst = BTRFS_I(dst)->root;
>  
>