Re: [PATCH 2/2] soc: mediatek: devapc: add devapc-mt6779 driver
From: Randy Dunlap
Date: Mon Jul 06 2020 - 23:33:09 EST
On 7/6/20 8:30 PM, Neal Liu wrote:
> Hi Randy,
>
> Thanks for your review.
>
> On Mon, 2020-07-06 at 09:13 -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote:
>> On 7/6/20 2:28 AM, Neal Liu wrote:
>>> diff --git a/drivers/soc/mediatek/devapc/Kconfig b/drivers/soc/mediatek/devapc/Kconfig
>>> new file mode 100644
>>> index 0000000..b0f7d0e
>>> --- /dev/null
>>> +++ b/drivers/soc/mediatek/devapc/Kconfig
>>> @@ -0,0 +1,17 @@
>>> +config MTK_DEVAPC
>>> + tristate "Mediatek Device APC Support"
>>> + help
>>> + Device APC is a HW IP controlling internal device security.
>>
>> preferably: s/HW/hardware/
>>
>>> + MediaTek bus frabric provides TrustZone security support and data
>>
>> fabric
>>
>>> + protection to prevent slaves from being accessed by unexpected
>>> + bus masters.
>>> + Device APC prevents malicious access to internal devices.
>>> +
>>> +config DEVAPC_MT6779
>>> + tristate "Mediatek MT6779 Device APC driver"
>>> + select MTK_DEVAPC
>>> + help
>>> + Say yes here to enable support Mediatek MT6779 Device APC driver.
>>
>> support for Mediatek
>>
>>> + This driver mainly used to handle the violation with 1 DEVAPC AO/PDs.
>>
>> This driver is mainly used ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>>
>> What is that meaningless string of chars? ^^^^^^^
>
> I did not see any meaningless string of chars from my original patch.
> Is there something wrong?
To someone who is reading the Kconfig help text but is unfamiliar with this device,
I would say that "1 DEVAPC AO/PDs" is not helpful at all.
> [1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2020/7/6/168
>
>>
>>> + The violation information are logged for further analysis or
>>
>> is
>>
>>> + countermeasures.
>>
>> thanks.
>
thanks.
--
~Randy