Re: [PATCH 01/16] init: remove the bstat helper
From: Song Liu
Date: Tue Jul 07 2020 - 12:54:46 EST
On Tue, Jul 7, 2020 at 3:34 AM Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jul 02, 2020 at 04:25:41PM -0700, Song Liu wrote:
> > Hi Christoph,
> >
> > On Mon, Jun 15, 2020 at 5:53 AM Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx> wrote:
> > >
> > > The only caller of the bstat function becomes cleaner and simpler when
> > > open coding the function.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
> >
> > Thanks for the set. md parts of the set look good to me.
> >
> > How should we route this set, as it touches multiple subsystems?
>
> Good question as there is no really applicable tree. One option
> would the vfs tree as it toucheÑ some VFS stuff, and the follow on
> series that depends on it is all about VFS bits. Alternatively I
> could set up a tree just for these bits. The important bit is that
> it doesn't go into the -mm tree as the usual catchall, as I have
> more stuff that depends on it and requires a git tree.
Would this official mm tree work?
T: git git://github.com/hnaz/linux-mm.git
If not, I am OK with either vfs tree or a dedicated tree.
Thanks,
Song