Re: [PATCH v3 06/20] seqlock: Extend seqcount API with associated locks

[Peter Zijlstra]

On Tue, Jul 07, 2020 at 04:37:26PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> + * Use the ``_irqsave`` and ``_bh`` variants instead if the read side
> + * ``_bh`` variant of write_seqlock(). Use only if the read side section
> + * ``_irq`` variant of write_sequnlock(). The write side section of
> + * ``_irqsave`` variant of write_seqlock(). Use if the read section of
> + * ``_irqrestore`` variant of write_sequnlock(). The write section of
> + * ``_bh`` variant of read_seqlock_excl(). Use this variant if the
> + * ``_bh`` variant of read_sequnlock_excl(). The closed section must've
> + * ``_irq`` variant of read_seqlock_excl(). Use this only if the
> + * ``_irq`` variant of read_sequnlock_excl(). The closed section must've
> + * ``_irqsave`` variant of read_seqlock_excl(). Use this only if the
> + * ``_irqrestore`` variant of read_sequnlock_excl(). The closed section
> + * This is the ``_irqsave`` variant of read_seqbegin_or_lock(). Use if
> + * This is the ``_irqrestore`` variant of done_seqretry(). The read

Can we also get rid of that '' nonsense, the gods of ASCII gifted us "
for this.