linux-next: manual merge of the block tree with the fscrypt tree

[Stephen Rothwell]

Hi all,

Today's linux-next merge of the block tree got a conflict in:

  fs/buffer.c

between commit:

  4f74d15fe408 ("ext4: add inline encryption support")

from the fscrypt tree and commit:

  ed9b3196d2b2 ("fs: remove a weird comment in submit_bh_wbc")

from the block tree.

I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
is submitted for merging.  You may also want to consider cooperating
with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
complex conflicts.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

diff --cc fs/buffer.c
index dc5e05b47646,2725ebbcfdc2..000000000000
--- a/fs/buffer.c
+++ b/fs/buffer.c
@@@ -3039,14 -3040,7 +3039,10 @@@ static int submit_bh_wbc(int op, int op
  	if (test_set_buffer_req(bh) && (op == REQ_OP_WRITE))
  		clear_buffer_write_io_error(bh);
  
- 	/*
- 	 * from here on down, it's all bio -- do the initial mapping,
- 	 * submit_bio -> generic_make_request may further map this bio around
- 	 */
  	bio = bio_alloc(GFP_NOIO, 1);
 +
 +	fscrypt_set_bio_crypt_ctx_bh(bio, bh, GFP_NOIO);
 +
  	bio->bi_iter.bi_sector = bh->b_blocknr * (bh->b_size >> 9);
  	bio_set_dev(bio, bh->b_bdev);
  	bio->bi_write_hint = write_hint;

Attachment: pgpJ2PV7NNlSX.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature